Re: 01/04: gnu: libtorrent-rasterbar: Update to 2.0.10.

2025-04-22 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Felix, Felix Lechner writes: > Hi Maxim, > > On Sun, Dec 15 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > >> Not sure what you meant to vent about here [...] but I do note that >> quite a few of your commits have made it: > > Thanks, but my message was about the commits that didn't make it: > > For example,

Re: [bug#76407] Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started

2025-04-22 Thread André Batista
Hi Liliana, seg 21 abr 2025 às 16:07:14 (1745262434), liliana.prik...@gmail.com enviou: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 0

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: > I have to admit I just do not fully get the thought process behind the > current design, so I wanted the option of "keep X old" to work around my > ignorance. :) Right now, the initial rotation is based on *size*, but > the number of kept old files is b

Re: Data corruption on reboot

2025-04-22 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, Attila Lendvai writes: > if at boot i see `root: recovering journal` printed, does that mean > that i'm also affected? Probably yes. > it was after a plain and simple reboot, i.e. no reconfigure prior to it, and > it's not causing a lot of issues. sometimes some lost inodes messages, but

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Tomas Volf
Ludovic Courtès writes: > [..] > > Expiry is expressed as a duration. I’m skeptical about expressing it as > a number of files. > > One thing we could do is make #:expiry a procedure taking a file name > and returning its expiry. I have to admit I just do not fully get the thought process behin

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Z572 writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> There’s an undocumented way to rewrite the service graph: see >> ‘define-service-type-mapping’. >> >> We could perhaps make it “first-class” so one can more easily make this >> kind of customization. > > Please do this, it can greatly enhance the

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Z572
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Z572 writes: > >> Currently, it is not possible to simply modify an extended service to a >> variant. For example, I want to use a modified log-rotation-service-type >> (NL) to replace the original log-rotation-service-type (OL). >> >> (someone-service-type) --extension

Re: [shepherd] Setting up a queue for tasks

2025-04-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nicolas Graves writes: > Maybe the recent work of Noé makes it simpler to implement as an > extension? > > https://codeberg.org/cons-town/guile-debugger/src/branch/main/shepherd-nrepl/ Dunno, I’m not sure how nREPL relates to this. Anyhow, like I wrote, it’s already possible to define this kind

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Z572 writes: > Currently, it is not possible to simply modify an extended service to a > variant. For example, I want to use a modified log-rotation-service-type > (NL) to replace the original log-rotation-service-type (OL). > > (someone-service-type) --extension--> (OL) --extension--> > (shephe

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Z572
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > Z572 writes: > >> I think our modify-services may lack a function to replace the >> service-type, so that we can easily experiment with new service-types, >> inherit and modify them to the behavior we want. > > I’m not sure what you mean. > > You could always

Re: How to move forward about Rust? antioxidant, cargo2guix, etc.

2025-04-22 Thread Hilton Chain
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:44:06 +0800, Hilton Chain wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:39:44 +0800, > Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Hilton Chain writes: > > > > >> Just realized cross-compilation support (rust-sysroot) is missing when > > >> using > > >> other build systems. > > > > >

Re: Data corruption on reboot

2025-04-22 Thread Attila Lendvai
if at boot i see `root: recovering journal` printed, does that mean that i'm also affected? it was after a plain and simple reboot, i.e. no reconfigure prior to it, and it's not causing a lot of issues. sometimes some lost inodes messages, but nothing that breaks anything. i tried to paste the

Re: [shepherd] Setting up a queue for tasks

2025-04-22 Thread Nicolas Graves
Maybe the recent work of Noé makes it simpler to implement as an extension? https://codeberg.org/cons-town/guile-debugger/src/branch/main/shepherd-nrepl/ On 2025-04-21 19:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Graves writes: > >> I recently tried to use the task-spooler package

Re: Regarding removal of the rottlog-service-type

2025-04-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Z572 writes: > I think our modify-services may lack a function to replace the > service-type, so that we can easily experiment with new service-types, > inherit and modify them to the behavior we want. I’m not sure what you mean. You could always (with or without ‘modify-services’) remo

New Slovak PO file for 'shepherd' (version 1.0.4rc1)

2025-04-22 Thread Translation Project Robot
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'shepherd' has been submitted by the Slovak team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/shepherd/sk.po (We can arrange things so tha

issue on postgresql

2025-04-22 Thread Antonio Carlos Padoan Junior
Hi, I hope I'm not spamming here. I'm trying to set up a PostgreSQL system container, starting exactly from the example in the Guix cookbook. Unfortunately, the container's Shepherd instance doesn't seem to activate the service — PostgreSQL is marked as enabled but remains stopped. If I try to re

Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started

2025-04-22 Thread Steve George
On 21 Apr, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Guix, > > as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion > period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some > changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg > one), but barring any emergenc

Re: Deliberation period for GCD 003 "Rename the default branch" has technically started

2025-04-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
I accept.