Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

On 2025-02-14 23:00, Tomas Volf wrote: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: Maybe a blog post stating that Guix does not support slavery would achieve the same goal of stating the position of the project, without having the technical cost associated? We already have a CoC for that and yet a per

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > >> Note that these steps are really not that different from moving Guix to >> Codeberg (you have to update %default-channel-url). Since users have >> to update either way, it's better to do both at once than just one at a >> ti

Re: G-Golf in Guix - G-Golf pkg(s) name(s)

Hello Andreas, > we have packaging guidelines to make things predictable for users Imo, this is a counter argument: users do hear about GNU G-Golf, g-golf, through emails, #guile, #guix, #gtk, #introspection ... dedicated 'news' websites ... not because of guix. By renaming, guix actually turns

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Note that these steps are really not that different from moving Guix to > Codeberg (you have to update %default-channel-url). Since users have > to update either way, it's better to do both at once than just one at a > time. For users running from a git checkout

Re: [bug#55231] Understanding #:substitutable? and #55231

Hi Leo, > If Maxime's concern is that Guix should not make it too easy for users > to distribute software for which they do not have the license, I hear > that concern, but I argue that we shouldn't go very far with it. Of > course, Guix itself should not do that kind of thing, but we shouldn't >

Re: [bug#74736] Guix Consensus Document process ratified!

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:40:15PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > ¹ Here’s what I collected from the deliberation thread at > : > > * Support (team members) > > - Andreas Enge > - André Batista > - Andrew Tropin > - Efraim Flashner > - E

Re: [bug#55231] Understanding #:substitutable? and #55231

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 04:10:22PM +, Morgan Arnold wrote: > Maxime's concern seems to me to be more about the fact that this > change facilitates (and arguably encourages) the accidental commission > of copyright violations. This issue is not necessarily specific to > Linux+ZFS, but is the pri

Re: [bug#55231] Understanding #:substitutable? and #55231

Hi Leo, Thanks for your interest! > If it is the case, then I don't think that Guix needs to do anything > about this except prevent our CI infrastructure from building the ZFS > module. We wouldn't need to hardcode any restrictions into the Guix > codebase. We have created these kinds of CI rest

Re: example of poor debugging message (follow up Guix Days)

for easy debuggability it's crucial to keep both the spatial and temporal distance small between actions and their effects. maybe more generally the distance between interconnected parts. what happens here is that LOCAL-FILE is a constructor for a complex data structure (i.e. its SELECT? field

Re: example of poor debugging message (follow up Guix Days)

Simon Tournier writes: > Some of us are not always happy with the Guix/Guile error reporting. As > discussed at the Guix Days, maybe the best strategy to improve the > situation is to report small examples that we can work on. Therefore, > here one that I have just hit today when working on Jul

Re: Re: Numerical problem (compiling python-numba package)

We may limit the test suite to bare minimum Nix did it refering the same reason https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-24.11/pkgs/development/python-modules/numba/default.nix#L129 Oleg

example of poor debugging message (follow up Guix Days)

Hi, Some of us are not always happy with the Guix/Guile error reporting. As discussed at the Guix Days, maybe the best strategy to improve the situation is to report small examples that we can work on. Therefore, here one that I have just hit today when working on Julia. Here a minimalist examp

Solved (workaround): issues setting up directory-server-service (389 LDAP server)

Hello, (see below for the workaround) Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > I'm trying to setup an LDAP service in Guix System this is my current system: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Generation 71 Feb 14 2025 11:51:55(current) file name: /var/guix/profiles/

issues setting up directory-server-service (389 LDAP server)

Hello, I'm trying to setup an LDAP service in Guix System This is the configuration I'm using in my operating-system: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (service directory-server-service-type (directory-server-instance-configuration (slapd