reza writes:
> To access the email lists on savannah you%d
> provide an email address and a password, to create an account on%d
> codeberg you provide exactly the same information.
For participating in the email lists (both bug reports and patch
submissions), you only need to send an email. You
Attila Lendvai writes:
> - writing comments on a PR or issue in emacs
I have yet to see a way (that works with existing forges) that matches
the ease of replying to an email, but I look forward to being proven
wrong and pleasantly surprised.
> what i wanted to point out is that it's not a lot o
>ven. 31 janv. 2025 at 14:27, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
> On 2025-01-31 13:25, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> I don't think so: who would open issues on behalf of other users sending
>> emails to that mailing lists?
>
> We could make a bot that gets email bugs from bug-guix and files them to
> codeber
> > and as for the efficiency of the new workflow: i think it strictly depends
> > on
> > how easy it is to script the new infrastructure. and if the new infra has
> > more
> > structured/formal ways to store/access the data than debbugs and mailing
> > lists,
> > then i'm pretty sure it can onl
Attila Lendvai writes:
> do you think there's a substantial number of reviews done by people
> who don't have the commit bit? and that their review is a substantial
> help for the patch throughput?
My point is precisely that I do not know definitively what is the case.
And as such, it needs _som
> However, said move also has the potential to reduce the throughput of
> reviews. It's not clear that the number of Guix contributors who
do you think there's a substantial number of reviews done by people who don't
have the commit bit? and that their review is a substantial help for the patch
> On Jan 30, 2025, at 22:59, Vivien Kraus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> Le jeudi 30 janvier 2025 à 14:32 -0700, Brennan Vincent a écrit :
>> an email originating at a residential IP address is by far the
>> strongest signal for spam that exists.
>
> Are we sure about that?
Apparently I was wrong
Suhail Singh writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> ## Workflow
>
> While this section talks in some detail about CI and the merge workflow,
> it leaves unstated what the actual review process would look like (and
> what demands it may or may not make of the reviewers). Could you please
> elabo
On 2025-01-31 13:25, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
I don't think so: who would open issues on behalf of other users sending
emails to that mailing lists?
We could make a bot that gets email bugs from bug-guix and files them to
codeberg. Codeberg has an API that supports issue creation.
That should
Andreas Enge writes:
[...]
> Nevertheless, we would probably lose bug reports by people who cannot be
> bothered to create an account just to help Guix.
I seldom send bug reports but I will not create any account just to send
one (if having an account is the only way to send bug reports via
cod
Felix Lechner writes:
> Hi Zacchaeus,
>
> On Thu, Jan 30 2025, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> the Guix project is not operating the GNU list servers
>
> The Guix project could operate an authenticated mail relay for members
> like Debian does, but I do not recommend it.
>
> Kind regards
> Felix
Rica
Well, this is emberassing. Here I am replying from my residential
email. If I had read the FSF page on this more carefully, I would have
realized that residential addresses are "greylisted", not blacklisted.
It seems like my patch went through now... Ironically, I suppose you
could say my prev
12 matches
Mail list logo
