On 2025-01-16 15:34, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
>> The complexity is due to the requirements of not bumping the channel
>> introduction (to avoid the increased attack surface from having to
>> keep obtaining the updated one, as I discussed earlier), keeping fork
>> history intact (to avoid force
Attila Lendvai writes:
>> instead of calling for
>> the proliferation of private channels, a different kind of unmanageable
>> structurelessness.
>
> not private channels, simply channels that are not owned/controlled by
> the exact same set of committers as guix proper, and not demanding the
>
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>> All of these things discussed in this thread are technically
>> possible. But I think that we all agree that the friction involved,
>> compared to just using my own fork with the patch applied, is much
>> larger, at least in my opinion.
> Yes, we can agree that t
Saturanya Rahjane de Lasca writes:
>> Again, not disputing that things work fine for people with commit
>> access. Perhaps that is part of why this issue hasn't been addressed
>> before :P
> You may call us privileged – and yes, we are – but that doesn't change
> the fact that weakening security
Cool,
... Im still trying to work out what day of the week that the Day
`futurile` occupies...
On 2025-01-17 18:14, Rostislav Svoboda wrote:
Im marked down for two days, but I will be going to the Friday event
(im
going to a community metrics event on the Thursday).
Also Im stepping out for
> Im marked down for two days, but I will be going to the Friday event (im
> going to a community metrics event on the Thursday).
> Also Im stepping out for a lecture at 230 PM on the Friday.
>
> Perhaps whoever has the stamina to navigate the buggy FSF site can
> update that detail, so that they c
Im marked down for two days, but I will be going to the Friday event (im
going to a community metrics event on the Thursday).
Also Im stepping out for a lecture at 230 PM on the Friday.
Perhaps whoever has the stamina to navigate the buggy FSF site can
update that detail, so that they can add t
Hello,
> Registration for Guix days is closed because we have 60 people signed
> up. Sadly we can only handle so many. If you changed your mind, you
> can remove your name from the list so we can let someone in.
In such a case please put me on the list. Thank you.
Cheers,
Bost
Hi Liliana,
Thanks for taking the survey!
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> For context, I already took the survey, but here are some comments that
> didn't quite make the cut for lack of a free-form field with additional
> concerns:
I had assumed the 'Other:' option could be used for additional
> instead of calling for
> the proliferation of private channels, a different kind of unmanageable
> structurelessness.
not private channels, simply channels that are not owned/controlled by the
exact same set of committers as guix proper, and not demanding the exact same
requirements from the
Am Freitag, dem 17.01.2025 um 09:32 + schrieb 45mg:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I have seen different opinions [1][2] regarding sending pings to
> patches that aren't getting reviewed or are otherwise lacking
> attention.
>
> To get a better idea of peoples' opinions, I've created a survey.
> Please do ta
Simon Tournier skribis:
>> Perhaps the “Decision Making” section could stress that, with a
>> paragraph above “To learn …” along these lines:
>>
>> Consensus building requires that participants share a common goal,
>> trust each other to act in good faith, listen to one another’s
>> concern
Hi Guix,
I have seen different opinions [1][2] regarding sending pings to patches
that aren't getting reviewed or are otherwise lacking attention.
To get a better idea of peoples' opinions, I've created a survey. Please
do take it, it's only two questions long.
https://sneakmonkey.limesurvey.net
13 matches
Mail list logo
