Hi Octavio! We had a discussion about this last month, and we might make some
changes to make it clearer what "advanced" means (or perhaps change the
wording.)
Here's a link to that discussion in the list archive:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-11/msg00298.html
Cheers,
Ryan
---...---
Este email es para el staff del proyecto Guix.
___
Cualquier otra persona no autorizada por mi Octavio Alfredo Toscano Flores
que lo esté leyendo le informo que está violando mi intimidad y pri
2022-12-09 23:10 mek...@posteo.de:
> 2022-12-05 17:23 i...@selidor.net:
>
> > in #59746 I skipped documenting `resume_offset` with more detail, even
> > if it's needed for resuming from a swap file. The reason is that
> > according to [swsusp doc][1], some specific tool may be needed to
> > comput
December 9, 2022 12:32 PM, "zimoun" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Preparing some Python stuff, I was toying with the package
> python-networkx. And Guix is awesome because it is easy to extract the
> graph of dependencies.
>
> Here dependencies are just inputs, native-inputs and propagated-inputs.
> It coul
2022-12-05 17:23 i...@selidor.net:
> in #59746 I skipped documenting `resume_offset` with more detail, even
> if it's needed for resuming from a swap file. The reason is that
> according to [swsusp doc][1], some specific tool may be needed to
> compute the swap file offset. There is [swap-offset][
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, Mekeor Melire wrote:
Thanks for making hibernation work and for bringing that up. I have two
questions:
1. Does hibernation work in case of swap-partition inside an
luks-encrypted device?
Yes, this works for me (nested LVM in LUKS too)
2. Does hibernation work in c
2022-12-02 21:32 m...@tobias.gr:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer 写道：
> > But then I wonder if I may have rushed to post the patch, as I don't
> > know whether hibernation is supposed to be more or less mature or
> > supported in Guix (we may not want to encourage people to use a
> > feature which may ea
Hi,
On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 at 02:32, John Kehayias
wrote:
> Here is a current (rough!) draft. For the ease of plain text email
> I've exported from the org source to text with some light edits:
Nice! If you can turn the draft into Markdown and format a patch for
guix-artwork [1] under website/dr
Hi,
On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 at 02:02, Csepp wrote:
> First of all, I'm curious, how do other Guile developers profile code?
Well, recently Ludo posted a heap profiler for Guile
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2022-11/msg00012.html
> Could we add a profiling flag for the CLI similar
Hi Antoine,
Cool! I have not really look yet. Just a minor answer to one of your
question. :-)
On Fri, 09 Dec 2022 at 11:05, "Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont)"
wrote:
>> It should instead show “git@2.38.1:send-email”. We probably need an
>> ‘output’ field in the ‘Packages’ table.
>
> Why must t
Hi,
We do NOT have a stand at FOSDEM 2023. We are not listed in:
https://fosdem.org/2023/news/2022-12-08-accepted-stands-fosdem-2023/
if I read correctly, although I did not received any email.
Thanks to everyone who offered to spend their time at the stand. Maybe
next year!
See you at t
Hi,
Preparing some Python stuff, I was toying with the package
python-networkx. And Guix is awesome because it is easy to extract the
graph of dependencies.
Here dependencies are just inputs, native-inputs and propagated-inputs.
It could be interesting to also include build-system dependencies,
Heya,
On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 9:32 AM GMT, wrote:
> How does a gullible noob like me know what the dangers might be, (e.g. http:)
> and how to avoid (most of) them by finding a guix version that has been
> gone through with a fine-tooth comb by trusted guix devs and has been
> re-hosted at gitlab o
Hello,
> So we went from 413s to 11s (on the Guix System node) for only 6% fewer
> files in the latter case? Do I get that right? That’s pretty cool.
Not 6% of loss, a bit more, around half is only detected between the
first and second round. Here is the summary [1] (org-mode) table I should
ha
Hi,
On +2022-12-09 07:33:16 +, ( wrote:
> On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM GMT, 宋文武 wrote:
> > I think it's missing what "build-derivations" do, or "Part 0: Store".
>
> Hmm, do you mean adding an example of building a derivation in Scheme with
> ``build-derivations''? I'll definitiely add that
15 matches
Mail list logo
