2022-12-02 21:32 m...@tobias.gr:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer 写道：
> > But then I wonder if I may have rushed to post the patch, as I don't
> > know whether hibernation is supposed to be more or less mature or
> > supported in Guix (we may not want to encourage people to use a
> > feature which may easily cause data loss)… Though it works quite
> > well for me!
>
> OTOH, I deliberately hadn't documented ‘resume=’ so far.
>
> OTOH, I have been hibernating multiple times a day for years now, only
> ever rebooting my laptop for kernel updates.
>
> So the feature is probably safe, and we should probably consider it
> supported at this point. Thanks for bringing it up!
>
> > So the TL;DR would be: Is it worth adding such documentation, given
> > the current state of hibernation support in Guix?
>
> I think documenting the current status quo in time for 1.4.0 is a good
> idea.
>
> The next step is to automate things so ‘resume=’ becomes optional.
> This should have landed already, but hasn't for personal reasons. The
> code is basically ready, but won't be in the release.
Thanks for making hibernation work and for bringing that up. I have two
questions:
1. Does hibernation work in case of swap-partition inside an
luks-encrypted device?
2. Does hibernation work in case of a swap-file inside a
root-partition inside a luks-encrypted device?
Also, I'm not sure if it makes sense to mark the hibernation-feature
stable and finished if the mentioned two cases are not supported.
