Hi Leo,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 22:02, Leo Famulari wrote:
> It's caused by $GUIX_DOWNLOAD_FALLBACK_TEST=none
Oh, indeed! Nothing weird in fact. :-) The derivations are different
(the way to compute) but the outputs are the same; recursively.
Fun! :-)
Thanks for this non obvious at first (at
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> The build phases that patch out these features would have to check
> for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
> option before attempting to run tests.
Then it could be a transformation. The idea sounds go
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 03:13, zimoun wrote:
> I am currently rebuilding all the julia-* packages. It is high probable
> some are now broken. But it appears to me not a blocker for the
> merge.
All is fixed in patch#52117 [1]. After this hacking session,
1. The package julia uses parall
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 22:01, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Thank you for the invitation!
Cool! I say each time to my self: next I will attend… and life happens.
Anyway, next time I will be there. :-)
(Off-topic ramblings…
> Threading is (or should be) based on message IDs, although so
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:01:32 +0100 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Hi jgart,
>
> Thank you for the invitation!
>
> jgart 写道：
> > Not sure what to do at this point.
>
> At this point, not much: you might reply to the mail with a
> non-empty subject, and hope that people will reply to that one, o
Hi jgart,
Thank you for the invitation!
jgart 写道：
Not sure what to do at this point.
At this point, not much: you might reply to the mail with a
non-empty subject, and hope that people will reply to that one, or
that they will manually copy it when replying to your original
post. Others m
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:11:50 -0500 jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers!
>
> I'd like to invite you to another Guix packaging meetup this Saturday,
> November 27 at 2PM ET (19:00 UTC).
>
> Let's try Big Blue Button provided by nixnet.services this time. It has a
> fancy whiteboard!
>
> https://meet.nixn
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ,
Leo Famulari ,
Ryan Prior ,
BonfaceKilz ,
Pjotr Prins ,
Yasuaki Kudo ,
Raghav Gururajan ,
Guillaume Le Vaillant ,
Pierre Neidhardt ,
Arun Isaac ,
Kevin Herald Reierskog
Subject: Guix Packaging Meetup Saturday Nov 27 2PM ET (19:00 UTC)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
Hi Guixers!
I'
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 04:03, Jacob Hrbek wrote:
> My theory is designed with tolerance of <5 min with max tolerance of
> =10 min with methods that I am confident will get us within <30 sec
> assuming sufficient amount of data to construct the variables.
Please back this claims with concre
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 20:55, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm seeing something weird, where Guix is creating different derivations
> based on the same Git commit, between two machines of the same system
> type:
Euh?!
Many things appear really weird. Just, how is it possible,
> Derive([("out","/
Hi,
I am not able to find in guix-devel archives this email with the
Message-ID 874k8xrn49@ngyro.com. Below the complete header.
Do I miss something?
Cheers,
simon
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 15:49, Timothy Sample wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Here’s a new version of the Preservation of Guix Report:
I am trying to package "Speedometer" [1]. This is the package
definition:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(define-public speedometer
(package
(name "speedometer")
(version "2.8")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (pypi-uri "S
12 matches
Mail list logo
