Hi, I am not able to find in guix-devel archives this email with the Message-ID 874k8xrn49....@ngyro.com. Below the complete header.
Do I miss something? Cheers, simon On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 15:49, Timothy Sample <samp...@ngyro.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > Here’s a new version of the Preservation of Guix Report: > > <https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2021-10-31/> > > (I hope to publish one every Sunday or so.) > > This version has a breakdown by different origin types. The good news > is that Git origins are doing very well. We’ve confirmed that 97.2% of > the 9,272 Git origins that we’re tracking are in the SWH archive. Most > of the progress there is due to zimoun wading through the missing > packages and telling SWH to store them – thanks, zimoun! > > Looking at gzipped tarballs, things are not nearly as nice. There are > quite a few old ones that are missing, and quite a few that I haven’t > been able to identify so far (either because I’m not getting the tarball > or because Disarchive can’t process it). There’s a “secret” graph that > shows that many of these problems are for older commits: > > <https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2021-10-31/tar-gz-abs-hist.svg> > > There’s also an “other” type, which covers everything else. So far, we > don’t know anything about these 8,830 fixed-output derivations (they are > all “unknown”). There’s a few shortcuts I could take to get information > on these, and I’m tempted to do so. I’ve also started working on XZ > support in Disarchive, which should cover about 2,000 of these. > > For the 236 “unknown” Git sources, 132 of them are because of recursive > checkouts. Currently, my tools don’t support this, and I believe Guix > can’t use SWH as a fallback for a recursive checkout (yet). However, > the other 104 are little things that could probably be solved directly. > The problem is that my automated tools can’t find the SWHID. This is > either because of things like upstream going down or changing a tag. > Usually one can find the SWHID manually using the SWH interface. I’m > not sure what to do about this at the moment, but it’s a tantalizingly > small number of sources to fix either by hand or by clever use of > ‘(guix swh)’. :) Here’s a query to list the 104 non-recursive > “unknown” Git sources: > > SELECT * > FROM fods > JOIN fod_references USING (fod_id) > WHERE is_in_swh IS NULL > AND EXISTS ( > SELECT 1 > FROM fod_references > WHERE fod_references.fod_id = fods.fod_id > AND reference LIKE '(git-reference%') > AND reference LIKE '%(recursive? #t)%' > > > -- Tim --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Delivered-To: zimon.touto...@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a37:9104:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t4csp2336196qkd; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 12:49:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvgHaZlE0R1aK1e39YCqs4LCseCqnnKMlMHIqF0dzcBg/agNqloTgH8G85ChAzYlU84aYx X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11c5:: with SMTP id n5mr25262930qtk.232.1635709752565; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 12:49:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635709752; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vxtvs1jxLqypvXF/A/PPrd5lHi4jJpp5NI2iyg59Afj2Ata/8WPjiTRqCQggN5PntS wspttVKuSApI4fcp2ekmv9IhrqdIjulMh31HgiO1zZjnGWidxVueIuPwVKqGitgvI1kJ LQYojHPkVkBPjZ6LVxdkdwoAxWBUn/rWx9vkJFtYMbOPrZnTUU5z3AblDRtdU4Rc++g/ GqmdcIOFDIt+jy/xJjoX41oGQ1dprsC2xiclCMWwi8k8x8/v1C8aYedIuiaYVfEDf/EX hW9sMdhipAsdFXZr6a8mQAp6fWCtFWKXDeepWwuKG78oi/S2hyBZhKx8/Nmu5kwg3PZP Q/Nw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=pYjq3HKbfv/iQhPEJethmChOBafhu6PDpTlamtcwHEE=; b=Zg4MOyFeOEulfXueHJhg6jTj6AmfKFnXDWORQaWpafO0aj52acZXmb+ezdh7bhYLPz Rbm2W69S3rZiQa4dLcV60rpay07FFzzANCWN/phv7NN6sM6h1Urh0DCJ/Ytaj8xKfYJ1 1W561tUl3rfegVPZcVb+1waY0mhtPpmxLLmKGqAwOWiQPQOdaxxK3AQuI8Zo69I3TAa0 AXrc6xCXyJsl+2bWgD28iHmKK3Rz8neHVZv5hlR9Pb9mclRbcrfI7nGs8wVYerJSmfuM yyOR4bwlcEDGPrJo8zR3x6GhqNP3LeIVUlHnV5XHNNi5aJ39oqn9xhKH09Vk1a9PaHqT QAsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=BSaf5eJA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of samp...@ngyro.com designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=samp...@ngyro.com Return-Path: <samp...@ngyro.com> Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id az10si10887225qkb.65.2021.10.31.12.49.12 for <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 12:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of samp...@ngyro.com designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=BSaf5eJA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of samp...@ngyro.com designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=samp...@ngyro.com Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045F95C013B; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:49:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:49:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pYjq3HKbfv/iQhPEJethmChOBafhu 6PDpTlamtcwHEE=; b=BSaf5eJAWk7bca9pQXqEIlYX3Z7b78g7qBO40E4hAbk8l SQf+b/xtD6Vtd0HgjilbM+3tqRSkL9UM9g4MFUJFR2xUkBUG36vITethY9C7dhxz ZOcVym1vkCOAeigX62j57nER4CVdp7mkC2tka4J24A2OBkF6dPPIx6dzLR7fF9g1 EdnWOZUgu6S3lXL9nzNb30AcdhSvWJcLxVLaepbcnuKVZuVsI6RUwrcJ+i1wkzRb wKn5xzL5UBlXdM3v9FXH6gVN84NPFRWxQW83G36FVMr+4OhP9Innw/nCRvo9j5T7 aMr1FqBpZ17j07bbhc19/O+l8rcOJmkk4k+g4foWg== X-ME-Sender: <xms:N_N-YS5CF6UK6-tZ4YYwZ7uk6b6AyHRVQnk7yeQEh7pjnby2axPspQ> <xme:N_N-Yb6dul5P3ud0XVqz0teBoQzSP_FVZsw-p7pAZxh-aIpgG5MGfzBZz_yfbb2d5 HsFMESK9xSIW27OEA> X-ME-Received: <xmr:N_N-YRc2tiUVV0fnh8u07IduDSEMoQ_eH8-F5py4xh3oP-U0cpmlYGC6Vcv-oD5_w1n-pfrWkYaxps8Zmjxoqw> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdehtddguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgfgggtsehmtderre dtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefvihhmohhthhihucfurghmphhlvgcuoehsrghmphhlvghtsehn ghihrhhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheeitefgjeduffevhffgkeevff fgjeelveduueelkedttefhfeeuudelffejgeenucffohhmrghinhepnhhghihrohdrtgho mhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrg hmphhlvghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:N_N-YfIdRdc-f70GkJDVxWgDvT_BkZZVSJ8iPd0CsIqkE7jMWEi89w> <xmx:N_N-YWLwsHQkdL-1i17VDOFXh18HD4y45O2QXSkEJbqeWq0TTMCz5w> <xmx:N_N-YQwCjb5GJ1RGYBuylFbVkm3NEDz91mxj79dyezqjcs4BXOfxpA> <xmx:OPN-YQxftUp7GE2iYQbe1nmemJLomBYXlYzRqlVGg-KP3C_8OgNFPg> Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:49:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample <samp...@ngyro.com> To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> Subject: Preservation of Guix Report 2021-10-31 Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:49:10 -0400 Message-ID: <874k8xrn49....@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-TUID: Wxp4aTcz+voG --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---