Re: Guix Europe yearly assembly minutes

Hi Andeas, Hi Guix, Le 10/10, Andreas Enge a écrit : > the minutes of the yearly assembly of Guix Europe, which we held last June, > are finally online: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/guix-europe/minutes/ga-20200621.txt Sorry if my question is a bit silly, bu

Re: Add the librewolf webbrowser to the guix packages

romulasry writes: > A fork of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom. > > https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/browser/common > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > Have you taken a crack at trying to package it? If so, perhaps it would best to submit a patch and host it from a ch

Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.

On October 12, 2020 7:32:08 AM GMT+11:00, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: >On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 05:23:30PM +1100, Brendan Tildesley wrote: >> Hi, I went through the installer looking for anything negative I >could say >> about it :) hope there is something helpful here: > >Thank you for te

Add the librewolf webbrowser to the guix packages

A fork of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom. https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/browser/common Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

New Spanish PO file for 'guix-manual' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/es.po (We can arrange things

Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.

Hi, I also encountered an issue with the latest iso just one day before the call for testing. I have already filed the bug here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43879 Marinus Savoritias On 10/11/20 10:32 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 05:23:30PM +1100, Brendan Til

Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 05:23:30PM +1100, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > Hi, I went through the installer looking for anything negative I could say > about it :) hope there is something helpful here: Thank you for testing! > Unrelated driver bug: installer was just a black screen until I rebooted >

New Russian PO file for 'guix-manual' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted by the Russian team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/ru.po (We can arrange things

Re: Release v1.2 and Translation

Hi everybody, I've noticed that at least the pot file for the manual has to be updated again, as some fragments of guix.texi has been modified since the the pre-release was generated (e.g. section 2.4.2 Using the Offload Facility), therefore they cannot be translated. I've open http://issues.guix

Re: Guix Europe yearly assembly minutes increasing membership

That sounds about right. -- Joshua Branson Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 16:25, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Maybe you misunderstood a point: the filesearch database is not a > database of _all store items_, but only of the items that correspond to > the packages of a given Guix generation. Yes, it is clear for me. I meant: “all the store items o

Re: Manual license (was Re: Translating the web site)

Thank you! I think it's alright (it says guix manual package because po4a enforces "package" at the end). Le 11 octobre 2020 09:57:25 GMT-04:00, "Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas" a écrit : >Hi, everybody! > >Ludovic Courtès writes: >> Those at

Re: First impressions from delving into Guix

From what I understand, outreachy has a contribution period during which you need to register at least one successful contribution with the project. Out of the potential interns who submitted a contribution, we then have to select one to work on the project. Well if you can finish the project be

Manual license (was Re: Translating the web site)

Hi, everybody! Ludovic Courtès writes: > Those at have > the same statement, but it should rather be the same license as the > manual (GFDL). Perhaps a ‘Makevars’ issue too? Sorry for bringing up this old issue so late, but I've just conf

[PATCH] installer: Add Emacs EXWM desktop environment. [WAS Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.]

Mathieu Othacehe writes: Hi, > The 1.2 release is on its way. So here's the traditional call for > installer testing. This time, the CI is building latest installer > images, which should ease testing. It works for me; I found Emacs EXWM missing however. After zenny also asked about that this m

New Spanish PO file for 'guix-manual' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/es.po (We can arrange things

New Spanish PO file for 'guix-manual' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/es.po (We can arrange things

Re: First impressions from delving into Guix

> On 2020-10-11 13:37 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > In particular, I didn't know that Guile was out of date on Arch Linux. > Now I understand why many Arch Linux users struggle installing Guix... :p Yeah, the `guile' package has been marked out-of-date in /January/. Fortunately it's very easy to b

Re: First impressions from delving into Guix

> On 2020-10-11 14:46 zimoun wrote: > > What do you mean? What do you feel that is missing? This one was a mistake on my part; I thought the module layout was much more rigid than it actually is, due to informal conventions, and the Emacs-style Commentary and Code sections threw me off. :-P >

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

Hi Pierre, I am trying to resume the work on "guix search" to improve it (faster). That's why I am asking the details. :-) Because with the introduction of this database, as mentioned earlier, 2 annoyances could be fixed at once. On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 13:19, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > --8<-

Re: First impressions from delving into Guix

Dear, Thank you for the feedback. On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 04:14, Lulu wrote: > I've been navigating Guix for the past couple days. Here's how it > went: Nice! > At first, I added a skeleton for `guix git log' by copying from > `guix git authenticate'. It might be useful to have a generic tem

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

Hi Zimoun, Thanks for the feedback! > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > time updatedb --output=/tmp/store.db --database-root=/gnu/store/ > > real0m19.903s > user0m1.549s > sys 0m4.500s I don't know the size of your

Re: Declarative /etc/guix/acl?

Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello! > For some reason, /etc/guix/acl is not declarative on Guix System: we let > users modify it and assume it’s stateful, which can surprise users as in > . > > Should we make it declarative, just like most of /etc? I think so. Yes,

Re: bug#39819: Declarative /etc/guix/acl?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 12:39:17PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > For some reason, /etc/guix/acl is not declarative on Guix System: we let > users modify it and assume it’s stateful, which can surprise users as in > . > > Should we make it declarative,

Declarative /etc/guix/acl?

Hi! For some reason, /etc/guix/acl is not declarative on Guix System: we let users modify it and assume it’s stateful, which can surprise users as in . Should we make it declarative, just like most of /etc? I think so. For a build farm like berlin, it would fo

Re: First impressions from delving into Guix

Great feedback, thanks for sharing! In particular, I didn't know that Guile was out of date on Arch Linux. Now I understand why many Arch Linux users struggle installing Guix... :p -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 05:23:30PM +1100, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > Hi, I went through the installer looking for anything negative I could say > about it :) hope there is something helpful here: > > > Unrelated driver bug: installer was just a black screen until I rebooted > with nomodeset:  htt