On +2020-07-13 00:01:32 +0200, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> an annoying thing for me in a default Guix installation is the lack of
> an inputrc definition[0]. So while using the shell I miss going through
> my bash history via "page up"/"page down" keys.
>
> To tackle this issue I c
Hi folks,
an annoying thing for me in a default Guix installation is the lack of
an inputrc definition[0]. So while using the shell I miss going through
my bash history via "page up"/"page down" keys.
To tackle this issue I created a simple inputrc and copied to
`/etc/inputrc`:
```
# alternate ma
Jan Wielkiewicz writes:
> But I made a smaller, better patch set containing only the necessary
> changes to make Jami working and up to date, until I discover why the
> typing indicator is not there and clean up the mess.
I've gone ahead and pushed those 4 patches, with just a few minor
tweaks.
On 12.07.20 14:33, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Jonathan Brielmaier writes:
>
>> On 12.07.20 03:44, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
>>> Commit 6680880f9b8dceb4f2f3f91bd2b13c659b53835e pushed out a new version
>>> of Guix, and it looks like it wasn't possible to build new systems from
>>> that because th
Hello,
I decided no to push my Jami from git version, because I discovered it
lacks the typing indicator functionality from an unknown to me reason
(maybe some dependencies are bundled in tarballs).
Additionaly I got my code reviewed and therefore need some more time to
make my commits more stand
Dear Marius,
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 14:33, Marius Bakke wrote:
> One possible solution that has been discussed before is to have the CI
> continously merge master to a 'stable' branch when lights are green.
> There are quite a few challenges to solve with that approach though.
>
> We could make
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 13:42, Jonathan Brielmaier
wrote:
> As I ran into all those little errors with `guix pull` this week-end, I
> wonder if we can do better.
>
> So maybe some pre-checkin CI which tests that a commit/commit series
> doesn't break `guix pull`. What do you think?
Jonathan Brielmaier writes:
> On 12.07.20 03:44, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
>> Commit 6680880f9b8dceb4f2f3f91bd2b13c659b53835e pushed out a new version
>> of Guix, and it looks like it wasn't possible to build new systems from
>> that because the filename for the "Berlin ACL key" changed.
On 12.07.20 03:44, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote:
> Commit 6680880f9b8dceb4f2f3f91bd2b13c659b53835e pushed out a new version
> of Guix, and it looks like it wasn't possible to build new systems from
> that because the filename for the "Berlin ACL key" changed. (Or at
> least, I couldn't run "gui
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Commit 6680880f9b8dceb4f2f3f91bd2b13c659b53835e pushed out a new version
> of Guix, and it looks like it wasn't possible to build new systems from
> that because the filename for the "Berlin ACL key" changed. (Or at
> least, I couldn't run "guix system vm".)
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
