Channel dependencies

2018-10-12 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi, the attached patch allows channel authors to declare other channels as dependencies of their own channel. In addition to explicitly requested channels, “guix pull” will now also download and build channels that have been declared as dependencies in the file ‘.guix-channel’ in the repository r

Re: Estimating build time

2018-10-12 Thread Clément Lassieur
Ludovic Courtès writes: > In a similar vein, the attached module provides code to estimate package > build time based on locally-available build logs. It can be used to > show hints like this: [...] > The obvious downside is that it works by first retrieving the names of > the files under /var

Reproducible rust builds

2018-10-12 Thread Nikolai Merinov
Hi, I made some investigations about reproducible builds of rust packages (at least of my laptop with x86_64 arch) and I got next results: 1. I failed to make rust 1.25.0 reproducible with LLVM 6.0.1, but this release reproducible if we build it with LLVM 3.9.1. I also tried to build rust 1.25.0

Re: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging?

2018-10-12 Thread Christopher Baines
Christopher Baines writes: > A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be > good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix. > > I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some > fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get > some failure

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2018-10-12, Björn Höfling wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. >> 12., P, 19:00): >> > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. >> > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that >> > disabl

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Björn Höfling ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 20:01): > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > > > Hello guix, > > > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > > There is

Flagging packages

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Gilio
I was wondering if there has been any discussion on introducing a way to flag out-of-date packages either through the guix package website or using a guix package flag. I, personally, come from an Arch/Parabola background, and such a feature was usually a good way to alert the community of some

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Björn Höfling
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > Hello guix, > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that > > disables generating the co

Re: Gradio attempt

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Gilio
Leo Famulari writes: On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:33:31PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote: Thank you for your feedback on the description. As for whether or not the application works, yes. I click on "Add stations to library". It takes a few seconds for it to populate, but I am eventually shown seve

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 19:00): > > Hello guix, > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables > generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. > Currently I see two ways fo

Re: Meetup in Paris, Dec. 10th!

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 17:47): > > Hello! > > Konrad Hinsen skribis: > > > Am 11.10.18 um 15:55 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > >> I’ve booked a room at Inria’s offices in Paris for the Dec. 10 gathering > >> I proposed a while back, see: > > > > Great! At what time

Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-12 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello guix, I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp. Currently I see two ways forward: 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls. 2.

Estimating build time

2018-10-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: [...] >>> Currently, there’s no way to tell if the derivations listed under “These >>> derivations will be built” are expensive package builds or just simple >>> graft derivations. >> >> Indeed. A simple t

Re: Meetup in Paris, Dec. 10th!

2018-10-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Konrad Hinsen skribis: > Am 11.10.18 um 15:55 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > >> I’ve booked a room at Inria’s offices in Paris for the Dec. 10 gathering >> I proposed a while back, see: > > Great! At what time does it start? We can aim for 9AM to 6PM. >> A couple of notes: the room capacity

Re: [outreachy] am I in the right track to contribute

2018-10-12 Thread Laura Lazzati
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > Hello Laura, > > Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > okt. 11., Cs, 21:58): > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:05 PM Gábor Boskovits wrote: > > > > > > Hello Laura, > > > > > > Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. > > > okt. 11., C