Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefl...@bjoernhoefling.de> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 12., P, 20:01): > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200 > Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > > 12., P, 19:00): > > > > > > Hello guix, > > > > > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem. > > > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that > > > disables generating the comment in the docs that contains the > > > timestamp. Currently I see two ways forward: > > > 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls. > > > 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was > > > specified, whenever > > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined. > > > I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it > > > seems much less work. WDYT? > > > > Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation > > unconditionally... > > Number 2 sounds good, and why not giving it a try to place it upstream?
Ok, i will go for it, and try to get it upsreamed for jdk8 and jdk11. > > Björn
