Re: cross-compiling in core-updates

Hello, Following the tests('./pre-inst-env guix build --target=i586-pc-gnu bootstrap-tarballs'), now shows the following: --- environment variable `PATH' set to `/gnu/store/5if2cargrflg5j9jh7ykqpgvm6p2ydid-tar-1.29/bin:/gnu/store/hbcpwp65nngw0abyhk27dgmbac47ymk0-xz-5.2.2/

Re: Debugging info unavailability

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> > Adding the "debug" to the default value of would every package > to now have a debug output; isn't this why Danny suggested to only > change it at the build system level? That way noth

Re: 04/04: offload: Avoid using '_' as a 'match' pattern.

Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> In hindsight, it would have been wiser to just rename ‘_’ in (guix ui) >> to something else, like ‘G_’. Well, it’s not too late. Should we do >> that? Thoughts? > > I agree that renaming '_' in (guix ui) is the better approach.

Re: potluck status

Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel >> writes: >> >>> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ >>> >>> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be >>> common to native

Re: potluck status

Hello! Andy Wingo skribis: > Here is part of the documentation in that branch: > > 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ > Excellent, nicely written as usual! > With the release of Guile 2.2.2, I have re-enabled > https://guix-potluck.org. I also refactored that server

Re: guix package / output for guix documentation

ng0 transcribed 0.4K bytes: > Do you think it could be good to provide the output of > guix' "make doc/guix.html" and other make doc/ outputs > in a separate package (or outputs of guix itself)? > > My idea is to have an independent online/offline version > of the html documentation, matching some

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add cool-retro-term.

On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:51:06 -0500 Eric Bavier wrote: > Hi Petter, > > Thanks again for your patience with this review. Hi Eric, I'm in no rush :) > "gpl2" in the license field should be "gpl2+" according to > qmltermwidget license headers. Could you also include a comment noting > the compon

guix package / output for guix documentation

Do you think it could be good to provide the output of guix' "make doc/guix.html" and other make doc/ outputs in a separate package (or outputs of guix itself)? My idea is to have an independent online/offline version of the html documentation, matching some snapshot or commit id. In my case, I wi

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add cool-retro-term.

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 13:59:29 -0700 Chris Marusich wrote: > Petter writes: > > > What do we do about the fonts without licensing info? > > Unfortunately, "no license" is not a free license: Yeah, I kinda figured that one just after I sent the e-mail :) > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lice

Re: Templates for monadic procedures

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> So, >> >> adds a C++-inspired template mechanism to (guix monads). Now we can >> write: >> >> (define-template (mapm monad proc lst) >>

Re: Debugging info unavailability

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Adding the "debug" to the default value of would every package to now have a debug output; isn't this why Danny suggested to only change it at the build system level? That way nothing which doesn't have debugging symbols by

Re: Defining user services in Guix.

>> Happy hacking! :-) >> Ludo’. > > Yay! Welcome Mathieu! Thanks Ricardo and Ludo ! Pushed as 5e03b122cf295d24e01861ca942505d47f9aa59e.