> Okay, pushed!
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* gnu/packages/video.scm (handbrake): New variable.
* gnu/packages/patches/handbrake-pkg-config-path.patch: New patch.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
.../patches/handbrake-pkg-config-path.patch| 13 +++
gnu/package
Marius:
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:27:29 +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Packages are not allowed to write to /var, so to run pcscd on Guix you
> will have to symlink ~/.guix-profile/pcsc/drivers to
> /var/lib/pcsc/drivers manually, until we have a system service for
> pcsc
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:56:41PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
> > From 7abe86a8d93e1a1ed11f14ec7ede22ce9b020611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari
> > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:23:05 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libtiff: Fix CVE-2016-5652.
> >
> > * gnu/
> From 2b0d70360296a9f7639529507bea6d28d3524e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julien Lepiller
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:05:51 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add php
>
> * gnu/packages/php.scm: New file.
> * gnu/packages/php.scm (php): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/local.mk | 1 +
> gnu
We package version 2.7.3 of pytest, which was released in September
2015. I guess that Python development moves very quickly, because there
are already some packages whose test suites require a newer version of
pytest.
Notably, the most recent release of Borg, 1.0.8, requires something
called 'tmp
* gnu/packages/backup.scm (borg)[native-inputs]: Use python-pytest-2.9.2.
---
gnu/packages/backup.scm | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/backup.scm b/gnu/packages/backup.scm
index 8ec2ee4..203ff4c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/backup.scm
+++ b/gnu/packa
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pytest-2.9.2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 9c7320f..ff3df3b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages
Julien Lepiller skribis:
> Here is a new patch that addresses your comments and Efraim's. Also I'm
> pretty sure you're not supposed to end a description with a full stop.
I’m afraid Tobias was right. ;-)
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Synopses-and-Descriptions.html
Tha
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Chris Marusich skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> (define-public guix guix-devel)
>>>
>>> +(define-public guix-for-environment
>>> + ;; We provide this pseudo-package just to allow people to run:
>>> + ;; guix envi
Chris Marusich skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> However, after rereading the whole series, I think what we need is a
>> ‘device-mount-point’ in , in a symmetrical fashion.
>
> That would work, and I'm open to it. However, before we decide to do
> that, what do you think abou
Leo Famulari skribis:
> I read this 3rd party security advisory about libtiff:
>
> http://blog.talosintel.com/2016/10/LibTIFF-Code-Execution.html
>
> This patch fixes CVE-2016-5652, which is a buffer overflow with
> potential for remote code execution.
>
> You can easily view the commit in this u
Leo Famulari skribis:
> I noticed that btrfs-progs was updated to 4.8.2 on core-updates twice.
>
> Commited to core-updates:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=core-updates&id=f02fb6dd6b6dbf91c3497a086bab5d9e791b2468
>
> Commited on master and then merged into core-updates:
> h
Julien Lepiller skribis:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:41:18 +0200
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> What I had in mind was just to add ‘compose’ and ‘extend’ to
>> ‘nginx-service-type’ (this is where we define how extensions are
>> handled). There’s a bit of extra bookeeping t
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:16:55PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
>
> > We typically package what the upstream maintainers offer, and only make
> > changes in order to fix bugs or to adapt the software to the functional
> > packaging paradigm. In this case, I don't see a reason to change the
> > directo
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 07:18:35PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-imagesize, python2-imagesize): New
> variables.
Pushed, thanks for the package!
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 27 +++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> David Craven writes:
>
>> Hi Theodor,
>>
>> I made libjaylink and jimtcl two separate packages and a couple of
>> style changes.
>
> In that case we can use the tarball release of openocd, no?
>
> This would simplify the package as we would no longer need to
> bootstrap
Sorry, I set today aside for a dumb ass paper I have to write, not
that I have gotten very far with it...
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-imagesize, python2-imagesize): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 1292a09..b7c9e11 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
David Craven writes:
>> This would simplify the package as we would no longer need to
>> bootstrap. Could you please take care of this?
>
> Probably. I don't know, I didn't try.
Okay, I’ll do it. I also noticed that the license is actually gpl2+.
I’ll change this along with the source.
~~ Ri
> We typically package what the upstream maintainers offer, and only make
> changes in order to fix bugs or to adapt the software to the functional
> packaging paradigm. In this case, I don't see a reason to change the
> directory the software is installed to. Is there a reason to change it?
/sbi
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:34:54PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
>
> > +(arguments
> > + `(#:make-flags `("CC=gcc"
> > + ,(string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
> > + #:phases
> > + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> > + (delete 'configure
>
> I haven't
> +(arguments
> + `(#:make-flags `("CC=gcc"
> + ,(string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
> + #:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure
I haven't moved the binary to /bin yet. If we can come to some consensus
on that, I'll m
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:03:39 +0100
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Julien,
>
> On 30/10/16 13:08, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> > here is a patch to add php to guix.
>
> Excellent! I see you've broken into my machine (probably through PHP),
> stolen my bitrotting PHP 7 package and greatly improved
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (nethogs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index ac88673..d0e0a79 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Kei Kebreau skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Leo Famulari skribis:
>>>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:33:18AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libjxr-use-cmake.patch
> >
Julien,
On 30/10/16 13:08, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> here is a patch to add php to guix.
Excellent! I see you've broken into my machine (probably through PHP),
stolen my bitrotting PHP 7 package and greatly improved it. Thanks!
An incomplete review:
> +(chdir "ext")
[...]
> +
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 01:08:28PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a patch to add php to guix.
> From b20406a07e8d8c99a189f5295929ff76a53d47e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julien Lepiller
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:05:51 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add php
>
> * gnu/packa
Arun Isaac (2016-10-30 12:56 +0530) wrote:
> Arun Isaac writes:
>
>> +(arguments
>> + `(#:make-flags `("CC=gcc"
>> + ,(string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
>> + #:phases
>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (delete 'configure
>
> Currently, th
> This would simplify the package as we would no longer need to
> bootstrap. Could you please take care of this?
Probably. I don't know, I didn't try.
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/psyc.scm (psyclpc): New variable.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/psyc.scm | 79
>> +++
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/psyc.scm b/gnu/packages/psyc.scm
>
> As be
Arun Isaac writes:
> Arun Isaac writes:
>
>> +(arguments
>> + `(#:make-flags `("CC=gcc"
>> + ,(string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
>> + #:phases
>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (delete 'configure
>
> Currently, the nethogs binary goes t
Hi,
here is a patch to add php to guix.From b20406a07e8d8c99a189f5295929ff76a53d47e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Lepiller
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:05:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add php
* gnu/packages/php.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/php.scm (php): New variable.
---
gnu/local.mk
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> @Ludo: at what time would you like this to start and for how long do we
>> want the room?
>
> I haven’t booked my plane tickets yet, so I don’t know exactly, and it
> also depends on what everyone else wants. :-) I think we’d have
* gnu/packages/pdf.scm (pdf2svg): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/pdf.scm | 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pdf.scm b/gnu/packages/pdf.scm
index 42547df..26705a8 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pdf.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/pdf.scm
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
Am 30.10.2016 um 02:13 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> As for whether or not the packages are required at run-time, I don't
> know. wxPython's documentation should explain what the software does and
> what libraries it wants to use.
>
> Hartmut, assuming that wxPython needs these packages at run-time, do y
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> General remark on commit logs: I can fix details there, but it would
> help me if you could more closely follow conventions.
Understood. I read the manual ((standards) Change Logs) and tried to
make it look like existing commits, but I see I missed some s
Arun Isaac writes:
> +(arguments
> + `(#:make-flags `("CC=gcc"
> + ,(string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
> + #:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure
Currently, the nethogs binary goes to /sbin. Should I make it go to
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (nethogs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index ac88673..89641fa 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
Hi Ludo,
I had already pushed the change by the time I got this email, and then I
forgot to reply to it in time. While trying to clean up my massive Guix
inbox I stumbled upon this unreplied email. My apologies for the delay!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> * guix/pro
40 matches
Mail list logo