On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:56:41PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > > From 7abe86a8d93e1a1ed11f14ec7ede22ce9b020611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> > > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:23:05 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libtiff: Fix CVE-2016-5652. > > > > * gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2016-5652.patch: New file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > * gnu/packages/image.scm (libtiff/fixed)[source]: Use it. > > I’d say go for it.
Pushed to master and merged into core-updates. I kept it grafted on core-updates, since changing libtiff requires ~1500 rebuilds. Oh well. It's a good candidate for a post-release "staging" branch. > 0 days since the last image library vulnerability… I don't think we'll need 64 bits for this counter...
