Chris Marusich writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> `wget https://blob` doesn't count as reproducible :)
>
> Very true.
>
> Self-hosting compilers are a cute trick, but they're a far cry from
> being reproducible. They're just inscrutable binary blobs. If we want
> true reproducibility from the
Doesn't gcc also belong in this category?
J'
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:54:24PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
Haskell, OCaml, Chicken, and other compilers that we package have a
serious issue that many of us are aware of: they cannot be built from
source! They rely upon pre-built
Leo Famulari writes:
> `wget https://blob` doesn't count as reproducible :)
Very true.
Self-hosting compilers are a cute trick, but they're a far cry from
being reproducible. They're just inscrutable binary blobs. If we want
true reproducibility from the bottom up, then it seems like the only
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> After much hesitation and questions, I ended up pushing something
> similar in spirit to what you suggest, but with my own words (commit
> 6f773606812075ee5c6747c3b7f95285254e48f2).
No problem. I knew I was 'messing with your baby.' But then again
* doc/guix.tex (Invoking guix import): Mention that the pypi importer
works better with "unzip".
* guix/import/pypi.scm (latest-wheel-release,
wheel-url->extracted-directory): New procedures.
* tests/pypi.scm (("pypi->guix-package, wheels"): New test.
---
doc/guix.texi| 4 +-
guix/import
Cyril Roelandt writes:
> On 03/25/2016 11:02 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> I have a question on python.
>> My theory is that this is true:
>> If I write a setup.py and contribute it to a project because I
>> want to make an "easier"[1] install in Guix and elsewhere,
>> I feed the "one packagemanage
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:30:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 06:37:28PM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> > This package builds fine on my Debian system but not on GuixSD. I've
> > attached my build output, since it seems you're having trouble.
>
> [...]
>
> > ==
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 06:37:28PM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> This package builds fine on my Debian system but not on GuixSD. I've
> attached my build output, since it seems you're having trouble.
[...]
> ==
> FAIL: test_nonexi
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:08:09AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:49:33PM -0700, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> >> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >>
> >> > Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> >> >
> >> >> Let me give an even shorter-term sol
On 03/02/2016 10:54 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It seems that all these files are left behind no? Could you make sure
> they are removed?
I think they are deleted. I call delete-file-recursively to remove
everything, and I can't see the files anywhere, so I'm assuming they're
really gone.
Cyr
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:49:33PM -0700, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> > Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
>> >
>> >> Let me give an even shorter-term solution: maybe there is a way to mark
>> >> things as risky from a trust perspectiv
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:12:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:46:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> > Earlier today I found that I could not build letsencrypt.
>> >
>> > The recent update to python-hypothesis broke python-pyopenssl, which
>>
Leo Famulari skribis:
> /gnu/store/2wakfpr67rnh8f1m0lm45wcaa1j2r29g-shishi-1.0.2
> /gnu/store/7v3093adf31b2sg2c46y3z2m24x2cjmi-gs-fonts-8.11
> /gnu/store/nv4qhmad49imc789l63plb3wd2cqambr-python2-cffi-1.4.2
All fixed now.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hi!
After much hesitation and questions, I ended up pushing something
similar in spirit to what you suggest, but with my own words (commit
6f773606812075ee5c6747c3b7f95285254e48f2).
The suggestion you made of describing features “top-down” made a lot of
sense to me, esp. compared to the previous
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:02:20 +0100
Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Is setup.py the equivalent of a package manager in python or does
> it serve more purposes?
Not at all. AFAIK, it's the equivalent of configure.ac / a Makefile.
pip is the package manager. There's
$ guix import pypi xxx
for ge
On 03/25/2016 11:02 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> I have a question on python.
> My theory is that this is true:
> If I write a setup.py and contribute it to a project because I
> want to make an "easier"[1] install in Guix and elsewhere,
> I feed the "one packagemanager per language" thing.
>
Not r
Here is my work in progress rust.scm, it is on pause until the
next release of rust as mentioned before:
~/projects/guix_project/guix/gnu/packages $ cat rust.scm
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2016 Nils Gillmann
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
;
I have a question on python.
My theory is that this is true:
If I write a setup.py and contribute it to a project because I
want to make an "easier"[1] install in Guix and elsewhere,
I feed the "one packagemanager per language" thing.
Is setup.py the equivalent of a package manager in python or do
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
Hi Danny,
in my long journey to panopticon (https://panopticon.re) I am at
rust now.
Through what I tested and searched while I packaged rust, the
next release candidate of rust will have an option for us where
we can disable the llvm tests because they are optional f
myglc2 writes:
> Chris Marusich writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Thank you for the helpful comments. I have revised the diagram
> accordingly. Please let me know if I missed something.
>
[...]
Hey Chris,
I added this diagram to the doc introduction, referred to our
discussions to inform further simplific
Mark H Weaver writes:
> I just pushed a security update for expat. See:
>
>https://lwn.net/Articles/681356/
Bah, nevermind. I already fixed this bug last July, in commit
99e29da15690a696690b28b065e0d1b19c9610db. That's embarrassing.
Mark
I just pushed a security update for expat. See:
https://lwn.net/Articles/681356/
I recommend that you update ASAP.
Note that Icecat includes a bundled copy of expat, so I guess it is
probably still vulnerable. I hope to update it some time in the next
few hours. For now, you might want to
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>
> Sorry, I was unclear. What I'm talking about is Guix *as a package
> manager* to be able to be available on foreigh distros so I can
> encourage friends to do:
>
> apt-get install guix
>
> ... and then do user-space hacking with Guix, and use "guix environme
Efraim Flashner writes:
[...]
>
> - ncurses installer -- my idea was Debian's installer can be considered ugly,
> but it does have everything needed to install a system.
Couldn't agree more. Don't know if you are still considering this idea,
but reading your comment and a couple more recent GSo
Thomas Ingram writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a big fan of the project and I'd like to help write an installer
> for GuixSD this summer for GSoC I'm including a plain text version of
> my draft proposal I'm about so submit to the GNU GSoC page. Any
> feedback or suggestions would be very helpful.
>
> So
sapient...@openmailbox.org writes:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Dylan, and I am a Swarthmore College student interested in
> working with Guix this summer! Attached is my proposal to help develop
> an installation wizard for GuixSD. Please let me know if there are any
> questions or comments.
>
> I am
Hello,
I'm a second year Computer Science undergraduate at the University of
Cambridge. I'm sorry for the lateness of this draft proposal (thanks,
Ludo, for redirecting me to this list), but hope that there is still
some time to consider it.
James
proposal.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF docume
There have been a few install wizard proposals for GSOC. They seem to
all focus on making GuixSD easy to install. But I think we should
consider:
o) At the moment, a Guix binary install is easier than a GuixSD USB
install and much more likely to leave the user with a fully working
system.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi, Alex!
>
> Alex Vong skribis:
>
>> Deliverable:
>> An extensible working bare-bone build system in Guile
>> Plan:
>> Idea:
>> Autotool separates the configure phase and the build phase,
>> in which the configure phase is responsible of probi
Hi,
is anyone familiar with our LLVM packages?
I'm trying to package rust and run into
/gnu/store/pmiw7p7a6hwl6k2kblsk3zwhxh3gln21-llvm-3.6.2/bin/FileCheck is
missing
when configuring rust. Indeed, it is missing in the entire tree
/gnu/store/pmiw7p7a6hwl6k2kblsk3zwhxh3gln21-llvm-3.6.2
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:04:53PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
> >
> > I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
> > satisfying t
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:53:56PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Attached the package for the Elixir language based on the upcoming
> Erlang package. It fails 12 tests out of 2845, mostly temporary files
> in the wrong place. I'll fix that at some point, but this is happy on
> my systems.
Cool!
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:12:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:46:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Earlier today I found that I could not build letsencrypt.
> >
> > The recent update to python-hypothesis broke python-pyopenssl, which
> > blocked the build of letsencr
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
>
> I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
> satisfying the linter, and updating anything that had received an upstream
> update since
sapient...@openmailbox.org writes:
> My name is Dylan, and I am a Swarthmore College student interested in
> working with Guix this summer! Attached is my proposal to help develop
> an installation wizard for GuixSD. Please let me know if there are any
> questions or comments.
This is a great ide
On 03/25/2016 09:09 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I like the goals you’re proposing for this installer. How would you go
implementing it? The proposal does not explicitly mention a UI library
that would be used, and how the UI code would interact with Guix and
GuixSD code.
I think most of the in
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Here’s a recap of what it took to add GNOME support to GuixSD:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8491
That was a really interesting read. Thank you for summarizing the
journey! It's amazing how deep the rabbit hole goes. Thank goodn
Woo!
On 25/03/2016, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As you can see, due to popular demand ;-), the minor version number has
> been bumped. I think it makes sense.
I'll take an extra laptop along for Easter dinner... :-)
Thanks to all contributors,
T G-R
sapient...@openmailbox.org writes:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Dylan, and I am a Swarthmore College student interested in
> working with Guix this summer! Attached is my proposal to help develop
> an installation wizard for GuixSD. Please let me know if there are any
> questions or comments.
>
> I
Hi all,
My name is Dylan, and I am a Swarthmore College student interested in
working with Guix this summer! Attached is my proposal to help develop
an installation wizard for GuixSD. Please let me know if there are any
questions or comments.
I am also interested in applying to work on 8sync
Resending this since it seems to have failed. Please ignore if original
email comes through.
On 2016-03-24 15:06, sapient...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hi all,
My name is Dylan, and I am a Swarthmore College student interested in
working with Guix this summer! Attached is my proposal to help devel
Hi Rémi,
Long time no see! :-)
How do you view the project you worked on, in hindsight? Would you pick
it up and complete it?
Cheers,
Ludo’.
Salut Vincent,
skribis:
> 23. Mar 2016 02:17 by cmmarus...@gmail.com:
[...]
>> This is a very compelling idea! Thank you for sharing it; IPFS is new
>> to me, and it looks intriguing. I understand that in the past, Rémi
>> Birot-Delrue did some work on a similar project to enable publication
Hi, Alex!
Alex Vong skribis:
> Deliverable:
> An extensible working bare-bone build system in Guile
> Plan:
> Idea:
> Autotool separates the configure phase and the build phase,
> in which the configure phase is responsible of probing feature
> provided by system, while the build
Hi!
(Removing summer-of-c...@gnu.org.)
Thanks for your proposal!
Thomas Ingram skribis:
> Plan:
>
> Before the summer starts:
>
> I will be reading up on the ncurses documentation and guile writing
> small programs to practice and prepare. I've been programming in
> scheme for six months so
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
[...]
>>> Does it make sense to push this patch to master? Or should we wait for
>>> an official release? Java 1.8 is already pretty old and it seems like
>>> the pre-release is enough to build OpenJDK 8.
>>
>> I
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> the latest icedtea-ified JDK has not yet been released, but this doesn’t
>>> mean we can’t package it.
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch to add “icedtea-8” (because it provides the JDK for
>>> Java version 1.8). It
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> the latest icedtea-ified JDK has not yet been released, but this doesn’t
>> mean we can’t package it.
>>
>> Attached is a patch to add “icedtea-8” (because it provides the JDK for
>> Java version 1.8). It uses the upstream tarball for versio
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> From 914756aa6c8893ce68f57dab575ed67f4d5ae560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:18:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnu-maintain and gnu-standards.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnu-doc.scm: New file.
Please add it to gnu-system
Hello!
Please consider the following GuixSD installation image for testing, and
report any issues or successes!
https://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/guixsd-usb-install-0.10.0pre.x86_64-linux.xz
SHA1: 85296c9352740fbcc2b83211a1af39302d9d5f41
https://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/gui
This is to remove code duplication in "emacs/guix-main.scm" and
"guix/scripts/package.scm" ('build-and-use-profile' did not exist until
commits 1b67644 and d1ac5c0).
The only important (or maybe not) difference is:
(set-guile-for-build (default-guile))
in "guix-main.scm" which does not exist i
I committed it with the changes you suggested.
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi John,
thanks for the patch! While the patch looks generally okay, I do want
to make a few nit-picking comments.
> * gnu/packages/datab
52 matches
Mail list logo
