Doesn't gcc also belong in this category? J'
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:54:24PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
Haskell, OCaml, Chicken, and other compilers that we package have a
serious issue that many of us are aware of: they cannot be built from
source! They rely upon pre-built binaries of the same compiler. I
understand that it's very inconvenient to not have these compilers
available to us, and all of the software that is written in their
respective languages, but I feel like all of our work is undermined by
making exceptions for them. I would like to remove compilers that
don't have a bunch of dependent packages yet such as Chicken until
upstream fixes the issue. But we have tons of Haskell packages and a
handful of OCaml packages and it would be heartbreaking to some to
remove all of that hard work.
What can we possibly do to avoid being yet another distro that relies
on a bunch of blobs (leaving the *true* bootstrap binaries out of it
for now)?
- Dave
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
