Hello!
I must admit I was put off looking at this patch by the addition of the
flags system, of which I do not understand the justification. Basically,
it seems to be an additional layer on top of what we already have in
our different build systems. We have #:configure-flags and #:make-flags,
and
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > +(unless (search-path (parse-path (getenv "PATH")) (%editor))
> > + (leave (_ "Couldn't find editor '~a'. Please check $EDITOR and
> > $PATH.")
> > + (%editor)))
An additional, heterodox suggestion: Maybe al
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The problem is not in your build tree: the error reported here comes
> from ‘guix substitute’, which is invoked by ‘guix-daemon’.
Thanks for this observation, and sorry for not noticing it myself!
> Above, we see that /usr/local/g
>From 6fd419709fe93511fc519701d4e496f95aba84e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 22:35:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add prefix to license imports in (gnu packages avr).
* gnu/packages/avr.scm: Import (guix licenses) with prefix "license:".
---
gnu/packages
Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
> As suggested, I've created a “wip-check” for this patch.
Cool.
[...]
>> Is GNU cpio available in $PATH? Which version is that? Could you run
>> this test in ‘master’ to see if the problem shows up?
>
> Yeah the test pass in master.
So I suppose I can leave the burd
Hi!
Patrick Hetu skribis:
> I still need to figure out how to get rid of the "fsck.btrfs not
> found" when the system boots. Maybe it needs to be in the initrd.
(gnu build file-systems) is where “fsck.foo” is invoked, in
‘check-file-system’.
The other place to look at is ‘base-initrd’ in (gnu
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus (2015-11-06 17:28 +0300) wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> I have taken your recipe and removed more bundled sources in a snippet.
>>> There’s still bundled stuff that we should get rid of, most importantly
>>> kmc, which brings its own execut
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
>>>
+Building the website depends on the static site generator:
+
+ - [[http://haunt.dthompson.us/][Haunt]]
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> Sadly, when I reintroduce sorting, I get a different error:
>
> === snip ===
> compiling... 17.9% of 463 filesBacktrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2401: 19 [save-module-excursion # ice-9/boot-9.scm:3066:17 ()>]
> 3085: 18 [#]
> I
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> We need to ensure that as soon as a module file is compiled, it's also
> explicitly loaded before anything else is compiled (which might import
> it), otherwise that compilation will import the "degenerate" version of
> the module
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
>>
>>> +Building the website depends on the static site generator:
>>> +
>>> + - [[http://haunt.dthompson.us/][Haunt]]
>>> +
>>> +To build the site, run ‘haunt build -c guixsd.scm’ to
Alex Kost writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus (2015-11-06 17:28 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I have taken your recipe and removed more bundled sources in a snippet.
>> There’s still bundled stuff that we should get rid of, most importantly
>> kmc, which brings its own executables.
>>
>> I also changed the de
Ricardo Wurmus (2015-11-06 17:28 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> I have taken your recipe and removed more bundled sources in a snippet.
> There’s still bundled stuff that we should get rid of, most importantly
> kmc, which brings its own executables.
>
> I also changed the description based on the paper; i
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
>
>> On a side note, it would really be nice to have a
>> r6rs-build-system... starting to result in a lot of similar spaghetti in
>> a few of these packages.
>
> Is there really a standard R6 way of doing things?
>
> I agree some factor
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> From 11496448abe3717279d5b6a5d31eedae7a1dcc89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus
>> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:22:26 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add BLESS.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bless): New variable.
>
> P
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> These packages need to be used in a somewhat peculiar way:
>
> - install *both* mupen64plus-core and mupen64plus-ui-console in your
> profile,
>
> - install all the plugins in your profile,
>
> - in your config file ($XDG_CONFIG_
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 05 Nov 2015 17:10, taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich
> "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
>
>> CPU:
>>
>> It used to max out every CPU core, now just one. :-)
>>
>>
>> Time:
>>
>> It used to take ~18 minutes on my machine, now less than 3.
>
> If you compile within a par-
On Thu 05 Nov 2015 17:10, taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich
"Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> CPU:
>
> It used to max out every CPU core, now just one. :-)
>
>
> Time:
>
> It used to take ~18 minutes on my machine, now less than 3.
If you compile within a par-for-each you should be able to peg yo
That patch looks much nicer. Thank you.
Diane
On Friday, November 06, 2015 03:28:23 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > One of our users asked me to install a package "bless" that required a
> > newer version of MPI than Debian provides, so I thought I'd try to build
> > a guix package as Guix
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> On a side note, it would really be nice to have a
> r6rs-build-system... starting to result in a lot of similar spaghetti in
> a few of these packages.
Is there really a standard R6 way of doing things?
I agree some factorization would be welcome anyhow!
> F
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 11496448abe3717279d5b6a5d31eedae7a1dcc89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:22:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add BLESS.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bless): New variable.
Probably you should add:
Co-authored-
On 2015-11-06 09:28, Thompson, David wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
Hi,
"Thompson, David" writes:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
Does the generated HTML change as a result of using Haunt?
Not as far as I can tell by looking at
Hi,
> One of our users asked me to install a package "bless" that required a newer
> version of MPI than Debian provides, so I thought I'd try to build a guix
> package as Guix actually has openmpi 1.8 packaged.
Great! Thank you for your contribution.
> The source tarball has the GPL-3 LICENS
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Thompson, David" writes:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> [...]
>>> Does the generated HTML change as a result of using Haunt?
>>
>> Not as far as I can tell by looking at the patch.
>>
>> I'm not 100%
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Hello, in current master (commit a09f6ed), I get the following:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello -n
> substitute: Backtrace:
> substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> substitute: 157: 12 [catch #t # ...]
> substitute: In unknown file:
> substitute:?: 11 [apply-smob/1
Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
> Cyril Roelandt writes:
>
>> * guix/import/pypi.scm (guix-package->pypi-name,
>> latest-release): New procedures.
>> (pypi-updater): New variable.
>> * guix/scripts/refresh.scm (%updaters): Add %PYPI-UPDATER.
>> ---
>> guix/import/pypi.scm | 50
>> +
(Oops! I originally sent this to guile-devel!)
Irregex, packaged for Guile! Horray!
On a side note, it would really be nice to have a
r6rs-build-system... starting to result in a lot of similar spaghetti in
a few of these packages.
I don't know how that works though, so consider that a researc
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
>
>> It used to take ~18 minutes on my machine, now less than 3.
>
> Sounds compelling. :-)
>
>> From fd5d9bf77fd38fad354d66c31e57bc9bbc86481f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Tay
28 matches
Mail list logo
