On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi, > > "Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes: > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > [...] >>> Does the generated HTML change as a result of using Haunt? >> >> Not as far as I can tell by looking at the patch. >> >> I'm not 100% sure if Haunt really buys us anything in the case of this >> site. Mathieu, do you see any current or potential future advantages >> to using Haunt having done this work? I'm really happy to see more >> Haunt users, but I also don't want to encourage its use where it >> doesn't make sense. :) > > For now it provides us a reliable and simple command line interface for > building the website. My hope for the future is that GuixSD website > will have a smaller code base that will use convenient generic > procedures provided by Haunt. Of course it will depend on what would > make sense to be implemented in Haunt. the first example I have in mind > is the the RSS/Atom feed importer implemented by Ludo in “www.scm” (used > by new Guile's website too) which IIUC could be implemented as a Haunt > reader. This would provide somekind of RSS/Atom functional > composability. ;) > > WDYT?
Makes sense. Let's see how it goes. :) > Continue the good work! I'll try. - Dave
