Re: Service refactoring

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > I’ve entered the polishing and documentation phase of > ‘wip-service-refactor’, with the hope of merging it within a few days. Damn, it took longer than expected, but now it’s merged! So now is the time to report bugs etc. :-) The documentation is pret

Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > What you suggest would be perfect but, if I understand it correctly, > it’s far from reality. What exactly is far from reality? I did not speak about what _is_, but rather about what we _should_ do to improve things. > There’s not a single project I know

[PATCH 1/2] gnu: sxhkd: New variable.

* gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (sxhkd): New variable. --- gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm | 34 ++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm index 96e7c3a..40dbef6 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages

[PATCH 2/2] gnu: bspwm: New variable.

* gnu/packages/wm.scm (bspwm): New variable. --- gnu/packages/wm.scm | 34 ++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/wm.scm b/gnu/packages/wm.scm index 9ca5b96..fe7d540 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/wm.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/wm.scm @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@

[PATCH 0/2] Add sxhkd and bspwm.

> Also was it intended to use "rws" as the Author name? If not, then > please configure your git to use a name you want. Well yes, I don't want to use my real name. I changed it my irc nick, is that okay? > Unlike the previous package, here it should be (license license:bsd-2). > As you can see

Re: [PATCH] build: container: Fix call-with-clean-exit.

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > David Thompson skribis: > >> From dc72ee831d6c6b93cf404a7fd1abc4b8fb27b7f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: David Thompson >> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:33:40 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] build: container: Fix call-with-clean-exit. >> >> Befor

Re: [PATCH] Add bspwm.

rws (2015-10-09 16:51 +0300) wrote: > FYI, this is actually my first patch to Guix. (I just installed Guix two days > ago too.) Hopefully this turns out okay, but in any case let me know how I > went. This is a really good first patch! > Also, if you see the IRC (#guix) right now (at time of wr

Re: [PATCH] gnu: bpswm, sxhkd: New packages.

Hello and thanks for contributing! We prefer a separate patch per package, so please split this in two. Also was it intended to use "rws" as the Author name? If not, then please configure your git to use a name you want. rws (2015-10-09 16:51 +0300) wrote: > * gnu/packages/wm.scm (bspwm): New p

[PATCH] gnu: sdl-union: Wrap into a procedure and export it.

Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-10 00:56 +0300) wrote: > "Thompson, David" skribis: > >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> Alex Kost skribis: >>> I don't know if there is a better workaround for the SDL headers, but this problem is rather common: there is a workaroun

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus.

Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-09 15:40 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> I don't know if there is a better workaround for the SDL headers, but >> this problem is rather common: there is a workaround in 'abbaye' and a >> special patch for 'pingus'. >> >> The problem is: the source code has lines

Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs

> What you suggest would be perfect but, if I understand it correctly, > it’s far from reality. There’s not a single project I know of that > publishes the list of public keys authorized to sign its tarballs. Even > if they did, we’d need a way to authenticate that list. > I think