l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> LGTM, please push!
I noticed that I have forgot to update the detailed node listing.
Here is the updated patch. :/
>From 51ac59f58dea877226827f5779e659aacdedf8a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Lirzin
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:39:54 +0200
Subject:
Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
> Alex Kost writes:
[...]
>>> +Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the
>>> +@code{(gnu ...)} name space rather than @code{(guix ...)}.
>>
>> I would use '@dots{}' instead of '...' there, although I see that the
>> real "hardcoded" dots are used in
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-08 22:19 +0300) wrote:
>
>> PS: I wonder if something could also be done for “./pre-inst-env guix”...
>
> IIUC there is no simple way to configure pcomplete for that. Here is
> an invasive hack I came up with:
Nice, thanks!
> (defvar al/pcomplete-s
Federico would be the expert, but it looks good to me:
Eric Bavier skribis:
> From 75a4305391cd246a6e8db5b11223f9ce243edd35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Bavier
> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:38:58 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] profiles: Search for ghc conf files only if package db
> exists
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 6cbd193a53f90e798efc4d83f7acb1d3ae51de12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ben Woodcroft
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:10:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add OrfM.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (orfm): New variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Wurmus
LGTM! A
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> Before pushing this patch I would first like to decide what we will do
> with the gnu patch PATH_MAX patch, because we need it for wip-hurd.
OK, I'll reply in the right thread.
Ludo’.
"Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" skribis:
> Aaand final reply to self, found this on bug-guix@:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2015-04/msg00072.html
>
> I guess I will just have to wait. But I'll make sure to chime in that
> ftp_proxy ought to be honored as well as http_proxy and https_proxy
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> From 075b0321ed609ee74f8c827081b2e9c9a19a9f4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Manolis Ragkousis
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:19:58 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: patch: Set PATH_MAX for HURD systems.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/patch-hurd-path-max.patch: New file.
> * g
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-06-10 15:30 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> (Sorry for the delay). I suppose it would be better not to push my
>> redundant patch. Could you just add a line for 'help2man' to your
>> patch?
>
> Your patch is not related to the move, so IMO it would be more
> appropri
Alex Kost writes:
> (Sorry for the delay). I suppose it would be better not to push my
> redundant patch. Could you just add a line for 'help2man' to your
> patch?
Your patch is not related to the move, so IMO it would be more
appropriate to keep a separate commit for your patch.
>> +Modules
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-06-09 14:42 +0300) wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> This patch will need an update when Alex recent patch (doc: Add
> 'help2man' to HACKING.) will be pushed.
(Sorry for the delay). I suppose it would be better not to push my
redundant patch. Could you just add a line for 'help2man'
Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
> do 'HACKING' copyright notices need to be added to the manual too?
Yes, please. (We may have to compress the copyright lines eventually
for the PS/PDF output.)
> From ccbbddb5d5335b3714a4e6204498f1fc24dca6ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mathieu Lirzin
> Date: Tue
Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-08 22:19 +0300) wrote:
> PS: I wonder if something could also be done for “./pre-inst-env guix”...
IIUC there is no simple way to configure pcomplete for that. Here is
an invasive hack I came up with:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(de
13 matches
Mail list logo