A couple roadblocks using guix

2015-01-21 Thread Omar Radwan
I'm trying to install guix on my laptop(finally got the thinkpenguin wifi card), after reading through the manual, I have everything setup, except there are a couple bumps on the road. One of the things is that during system initialization, the (gnu system networking) module returns an error which

Re: Circular dependencies in python modules

2015-01-21 Thread Andreas Enge
Looking at the code of both modules on github, there is: https://github.com/RDFLib/sparqlwrapper/blob/master/requirements.txt rdflib rdflib_jsonld and https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/blob/master/requirements.py2.txt flake8 isodate pyparsing<=1.5.7 SPARQLWrapper (and similarly for

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add most debian patches to nvi.

2015-01-21 Thread Marek Benc
On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching goes beyond our mission, IMO. I would rather leave it as is if it’s usable, or remove it, or point to a new upstream if there is one. In that case, I think at least two of the

Re: Server unrresponsive

2015-01-21 Thread Daniel Pimentel
On 2015-01-21 12:04, l...@gnu.org wrote: This message suggests that hydra.gnu.org, the server that provides pre-compiled binaries, is somewhat slow. This is unfortunately too frequent and we hope to switch to a more powerful front-end server. Thanks, Ludo’. Allright, I used the options "--no-d

Re: Server unrresponsive

2015-01-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
This message suggests that hydra.gnu.org, the server that provides pre-compiled binaries, is somewhat slow. This is unfortunately too frequent and we hope to switch to a more powerful front-end server. Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add most debian patches to nvi.

2015-01-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Marek Benc skribis: > On 01/21/2015 10:35 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: >> The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the >> current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix >> patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is ther

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the >>> ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor. So 'uname -m' must >>> output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the proces

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add most debian patches to nvi.

2015-01-21 Thread Marek Benc
On 01/21/2015 10:35 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is there no viable alternative that i

Re: [PATCH] gnu: libpeas: Update to 1.12.1, add arguments and disable tests.

2015-01-21 Thread Federico Beffa
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Federico Beffa wrote: > Please find attached a patch for libpeas. > > This package, up to now, is the only one experiencing some > side-effects from the gobject-introspection patch that we adopted from > nix and which installs the full path name of shared libraries

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add most debian patches to nvi.

2015-01-21 Thread Andreas Enge
The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is there no viable alternative that is still alive? Or vim in legacy mode? Andreas

Re: FOSDEM

2015-01-21 Thread Manolis Ragkousis
That's great Ludovic :-D I will be there, looking forward for it. Manolis