This patch should fix the failing rdup build. I'm sending it to the list
because I wonder if there's a better way to handle the missing script
shebangs?
`~Eric
From d27203fa893bba8c263aa519124af3cbb3178cee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:45:31 -0500
Subject: [
> I believe the ‘modules’ field can be omitted.
Done, I forgot to do that in the first place :P
>
>> +(propagated-inputs `(("gnumach-headers" ,gnumach-headers)
>> + ("hurd-headers" ,hurd-headers)
>> + ("hurd-minimal" ,hurd-minimal)))
>
> Add a one
Hello,
The GNU distribution provided by Guix contains package synopses and
descriptions that we would like to translate (see [0] to get an idea.)
For GNU packages, synopses and descriptions are kept in sync with files
from the GNU womb, which are in turn used to generate a web page [1].
Translati
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I pushed a new core-updates branch, with some of the changes I had in
> mind. Go ahead if you know of anything that needs to be fixed there.
>
> As discussed before, we’ll merge the branch before June 13th.
One week left!
As far as I’m concerned, there
Carlos Carleos skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès escribió / skribis [*]:
>
>> Did ‘make check’ in Guix pass in the first place?
>
> Yes:
Great.
>> Is the daemon running as noted at:
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Setting-Up-the-Daemon
>
> I think so:
>
> root@carleos:/usr/l
Carlos Carleos skribis:
>
> Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.22
>
> # TOTAL: 551
> # PASS: 411
> # SKIP: 139
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL: 1
>
