On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 21:07 -0500, Mario Storti wrote:
> I want to use let-keywords, however it bothers to me the fact that the
> rest arguments keeps the keyword arguments, so that I have to write
> code to eliminate them. I read that this is for comptability with
> Common Lisp. Is there an easy w
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 01:14 +0800, William Xu wrote:
> Hi people there,
>
> I try to learn GOOP today. As i don't want to mess with name conficts, i
> decided to add a prefix while using any modules. Thus to load GOOPS,
>
> guile> (use-modules ((oop goops) :renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'oop/goop
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:25 -0400, Dan McMahill wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sure this is a very basic question about passing "or-able" flags to
> a function. In C I might do something like:
...snip...
You can make the flags available to scheme as numbers, and then the
Scheme users can use Guile's b
Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to enable debbuging - that's (debug-enable 'backtrace) in
> Scheme - from a C program on-the-fly. Therefore, as far as I
> understand from the quite poorly documented guile manual, I should
> use scm_debug_options() for this purpose. B
Are there any up to date releases of GDS available separated from
Guile CVS HEAD?
--
So play today
Go make your hay beneath a warm sun shining
But bear in mind one day you'll find the silver cloud's dark lining
__
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> currently:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-module (a b c)
> #:use-module ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export (bar))
>
> proposed:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-modules
> (a b c)
> ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export
Klaus Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:38:03 -0500
>> and not abort the entire system. At least in SBCL it takes a lot of
>
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> IOW, `say_stop' does a `(sleep 2)' (or `sleep (2)'), or waits for some
>> UI event, is that right?
> ---
>> what is the nature of the pause? (I think that that might be important.)
>> How do you interrupt the tight little say_stop sleep loop (if that'
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answers Ludovic and Clinton.
>
>
>> An alternative approach could use a thread per script.
>
> By the way, I have a question about threads: is there a way to kill a
> running thread? For example when the current game screen chan
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> consider the following code (simple iteration
> construct invented mainly to cause naming
> conflict, as the function 'times' is already
> defined in guile)
>
> (define-macro (times n f)
> `(let ((env (the-environment)))
> (let loop ((i 0))
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clinton Ebadi:
>>
>> As a matter of style, you probably want to avoid local-eval as it will
>> have to be removed whenever Guile ends up with a faster compiler (one
>
> I've never heard this befo
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> How to achieve this effect without using eval?
>>> (I've tried (+ . l) but it didn't work out)
>>
>> (apply + l)
>
> Correct :)
> Here comes another one:
> Suppose I want to define a variable, but I don't know its
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been thinking of implementing this "location" stuff
> as a smob, but you've got the point that it is (probably)
> impossible to implement the location system without
> redefining set! and define.
You may want to read a few documents on functional
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is so wrong with forms like `(set! (vector-ref foo index) ...)'?
>
> In scheme the only problem is that they don't work, unless we
> redefine vector-ref:
> (define vector-get vector-ref)
> (define vector-ref (make-procedure-with-setter vector-get v
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to write a function or macro that
> would work like this:
>
> (let ((a 0)(b 0))
> (set-pair! '(a . b) '(1 . 2))
> (cons a b)) ; => (1 . 2)
>
> I eventually wrote:
>
> (define (set-pair! pair values)
> (let ( (e (the-environm
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other is that in GOOPS a method is something
> different than what is commonly known in OOP, because
> a class doesn't know its methods (and furthermore,
> methods can be created at any time of program execution,
> not only during class definition).
"Maciek Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/9/24 Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Interestingly enough, CLOS predates C++ and Java ;-)
>
> No wonder -- lambda calculus is a formal system to express concepts
> and you can express practically a
Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> but...
>>
>> "To build Guile-PG you need to have installed both the PostgreSQL
>>frontend library libpq, and a version of Guile that can load binary
>>module (a b c) from file a/b/c.so or a/b/c/li
"Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/11/23 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> If we had a clearer statement of
>> the present, it would not matter so much how people describe the past.
>
> Is there a clear expression of a vision for the future?
> What might one look forward
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/11/27 Maciek Godek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Perhaps the possible inconvenience is that all variable
>> names that happen to be the slot names of a given class
>> are shadowed. In the long run it may also cause significant
>> performance problems (o
"Panicz Maciej Godek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> with-slots uses symbol-macrolet[0] to bind each of the variable names to
>> symbol macros within its body. I don't know of anything in Guile that is
>> equivalent.
>
> R5RS pattern language allows to create syntactic aliases for practically
> an
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" writes:
>> Could you provide me some background why 1+ exists, as it is the same
>> as (+ 1, and why is it named like this?
>
> It'll be hard to get a definite answer: these procedures have "always"
> been there, at least sin
Neil Jerram writes:
>> The problem is,
>> of course, that if you scm_init_guile in some .so,
>> you will accidentally place the entire system into guile
>> mode, and not just the .so, as intended.
>
> Or, to put that another way, the "guile mode"-ness persists on the
> thread that called your lib
Mark Polesky writes:
>> (define (my-format bool string . list-of-nums)
>> (apply format bool string (map set-precision list-of-nums)))
>>
>> (let ((a 2.0)
>> (b 1/4)
>> (c 1/3))
>> (my-format #t "~&~a ~a ~a" a b c))
>
>
> Kjetil,
>
> Awesome. Thanks. I knew there was something simp
Mark Polesky writes:
> (define my-alist
> '((a . 1)
> ))
>
> (set! my-alist (acons 'b 2 my-alist))
>
> my-alist ==> ((b . 2) (a . 1))
>
> (define (alist-prepend alist key value)
> (set! alist (acons key value alist)))
>
> (alist-prepend my-alist 'c 3)
>
> my-alist ==> ((b . 2) (a . 1
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> Welcome back :)
> Long time no see
>
> I have a little question concerning GOOPS.
> (I didn't find it anywhere in the manual)
>
> Is there any way to force a certain function
> to be invoked during slot access?
>
> Say, I have a class definition:
> (define-class ()
26 matches
Mail list logo
