Hi,
[...]
> I expect the following to be equal, and they are.
>
> (cons 'sym func)
>
> (quasiquote (sym . (unquote func))) `(sym . ,func)
>
> Guile writes them both as
>
> (sym . #)
>
> But, the following is also equivalent, which is a surprise to me.
>
> (quasiquote (sym unquote func))
>
Mike Gran writes:
> (quasiquote (sym unquote func))
> `(sym unquote func)
>
> Is this a valid use of unquote?
>
> I get that (cons 'a (list 'b 'c)) == (list 'a 'b 'c), but, I'm not sure
> if unquote should be valid in that sort of construction.
As has already been pointed out, since ,foo is
Hi,
is there any way to control the order of macro expansion?
Let's consider a particular problem.
I'm trying to write a macro to control the visibility
of certain definitions. I wrote it once, using define-macro,
but it seemed to loose some relevant information,
so I decided to rewrite it using de
