I am pleased to announce that Guile-Lib 0.2.2 has been released. It
may be obtained at:
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/guile-lib/guile-lib-0.2.2.tar.gz
What is Guile-Lib
-
Guile-Lib is intended as an accumulation place for pure-scheme Guile
modules, allowing for peop
Hi,
A quick note to ask people to avoid libgc 7.3 for the moment. It
introduces a parallel marker by default that currently doesn't work well
with Guile. We'll fix Guile to deal with it, but in the meantime libgc
7.2d is the best option currently.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Dear list,
The following behavior is observed on both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0.
Is it correct?
Can somebody elaborate why it happens?
guile> (atan 0 -1)
3.14159265358979
guile> (= 3.14159265358979 3.14159265358979)
#t
guile> (= (atan 0 -1) 3.14159265358979)
#f
--
Best Regards, Hengqing Hu
z_axis skribis:
> i have installed threaded libgc:
> $pkg_info | grep boehm-gc
> boehm-gc-7.1Garbage collection and memory leak detection for C
> and C++
> boehm-gc-threaded-7.1_1 Garbage collection and memory leak detection
> for C and C++
[...]
> $./configure --prefix=/home/***/guile
What you have here is a precision problem.
When a floating-point number like pi is printed, I don't think you can
guarantee that the string representation will be read in the same way it
was read out. So when guile reads "3.14159265358979", it gives you some
floating point number that is *close to
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:32:53AM -0500, Noah Lavine wrote:
What you have here is a precision problem.
scheme@(guile-user)> (= 3.14159265358979 (atan 0 -1))
$8 = #f
scheme@(guile-user)> (= $7 (atan 0 -1))
$9 = #t
It might be possible to have Guile print mo
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:50 AM, John Darrington <
j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
>
> pi is an irrational number. You would need an infinite number of digits
> wouldn't you?
>
Good point :-). All I meant was enough digits that it parsed as the same
floating-point number that (atan 0 -1) re
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran skribis:
> Hello. I'm pleased to announce the upcoming Guile 100 Programs
> Project.
Very good initiative, sounds fun!
If you want we can add it to gnu.org/s/guile/news.html and/or Guile’s
RSS feed (which ends up on planet.gnu.org).
Ludo’.
Hi all,
I thought I'd follow up on my previous post regarding xlib and a guile
window manager.
First of all, I have guile-xlib working with guile-2.0; I'm calling my
branch "guile2-xlib." You can use git and pull it from
http://github.com/mwitmer/guile2-xlib or download an archive at
http://mark
That's a good start ! hope this guile WM will be more stable, fast and
small compared with STUMPWM.
I ever reported a tiny stumpwm problem(
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13174207/cannot-use-keyboards-numpad-to-input-digit
), but i havenot gotten answer now!
在 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:35:44
On 01/31/2013 03:35 PM, Mark Witmer wrote:
Hi all,
I thought I'd follow up on my previous post regarding xlib and a guile
window manager.
First of all, I have guile-xlib working with guile-2.0; I'm calling my
branch "guile2-xlib." You can use git and pull it from
http://github.com/mwitmer/guile
Greetings,
Does SLIB work with guile 2?
With guile 2.0.7 and slib 3b3 on Linux there appear to be
incompatibilities. Are there releases that work together?
Andrew
Hengqing Hu writes:
> The following behavior is observed on both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0.
> Is it correct?
> Can somebody elaborate why it happens?
>
> guile> (atan 0 -1)
> 3.14159265358979
> guile> (= 3.14159265358979 3.14159265358979)
> #t
> guile> (= (atan 0 -1) 3.14159265358979)
> #f
Sorry, t
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Does SLIB work with guile 2?
>
> With guile 2.0.7 and slib 3b3 on Linux there appear to be
> incompatibilities. Are there releases that work together?
Andy Wingo recently posted a patch to get slib working with Guile 2.0.
Hopefully a variant of it will be acce
I wrote:
> Sorry, this is due to an inadequate 'number->string' implementation in
> Guile.
Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also
less precise than it should be. I'll fix these issues soon.
Mark
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 11:48 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A quick note to ask people to avoid libgc 7.3 for the moment. It
> introduces a parallel marker by default that currently doesn't work well
> with Guile. We'll fix Guile to deal with it, but in the meantime libgc
> 7.2d is the best o
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Greetings,
Does SLIB work with guile 2?
With guile 2.0.7 and slib 3b3 on Linux there appear to be incompatibilities.
Are there releases that work together?
Andrew
If you want, let us know how the patches offered by Andy Wingo work.
I hope to
17 matches
Mail list logo