I wrote: > Sorry, this is due to an inadequate 'number->string' implementation in > Guile.
Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also less precise than it should be. I'll fix these issues soon. Mark
I wrote: > Sorry, this is due to an inadequate 'number->string' implementation in > Guile.
Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also less precise than it should be. I'll fix these issues soon. Mark