Hi Mike,
Mike Gran skribis:
> These are
> - Texmacs (#704515)
> - Autogen (#704517)
> - coot (#704518)
> - Demeno (#704519)
> - Freehoo (#704521)
> - Freetalk (#704522)
> - geda-gaf (#704524)
> - gnucash (#704527)
> - gnu robots (#704528) - looks complete, but bug is still open
> - guile-gnome-p
Mike Gran writes:
> Hi-
>
> With the Fedora 18 beta starting, I thought I'd check on the
> state of Guile. To date, Fedora hasn't moved past Guile 1.8.8.
>
> The meta-bug tracking Guile 2.0.x integration is #678238
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> But, it is bei
> From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org
>> These are
>> - Texmacs (#704515)
>> - Autogen (#704517)
>> - coot (#704518)
>> - Demeno (#704519)
>> - Freehoo (#704521)
>> - Freetalk (#704522)
>> - geda-gaf (#704524)
>> - gnucash (#704527)
>> - gnu robots (#704528) - looks complete, but bug is still open
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Mike Gran wrote:
>
> I intend to, but, where to begin? I'll try contacting some
> of the projects on their fora to see if I can lend a hand.
>
Thanks a lot! That would be a great thing for Guile.
> But first I thought I see if this thread here would yie
On Sun, Nov 18 2012, Mike Gran wrote:
[...]
> - mdk (#704544)
I have patches for a new version of mdk that compiles with Guile
2.0... the only missing bit is time :) i'm hoping to get to release a
new version before the end of the year...
jao
Hi Peter-
> From: Peter TB Brett
> I'll be releasing a new version of geda-gaf (1.8.0) which supports 2.0.x
> well
> within the next few hours, hopefully.
That's great news. Thank you.
-Mike Gran
Hi Jao-
> From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
> I have patches for a new version of mdk that compiles with Guile
> 2.0... the only missing bit is time :) i'm hoping to get to release a
> new version before the end of the year...
Great. Let me know if you need anything.
-Mike Gran
On 18 November 2012 23:42, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> People can correct me if I’m wrong, but I think many of these packages
> couldn’t switch transparently to Guile 2.0, and the required porting
> effort hasn’t been started or completed yet.
Mike
You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8
Hi Daniel-
> From: Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com
> You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8 and guile-2.0
> packages to keep things moving. Or, does Fedora not encourage
> packaging schemes like that?
First, I don't want to misrepresent my role. I'm only a Fedora
user and busybody.
On 19 November 2012 10:14, Mike Gran wrote:
>> You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8 and guile-2.0
>> packages to keep things moving. Or, does Fedora not encourage
>> packaging schemes like that?
>
> First, I don't want to misrepresent my role. I'm only a Fedora
> user and busybody.
10 matches
Mail list logo