On 18 November 2012 23:42, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > People can correct me if I’m wrong, but I think many of these packages > couldn’t switch transparently to Guile 2.0, and the required porting > effort hasn’t been started or completed yet.
Mike You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8 and guile-2.0 packages to keep things moving. Or, does Fedora not encourage packaging schemes like that?
