Hello list
I'm new to scheme and guile - started using them a few
days ago for a project. So here we go: this is the bit of code that
causing me troubles:
(define (foo)
(call/cc
(lambda (return)
(display "first part")
(newline)
(call/cc
(lambda (cont)
(return co
Hi Cedric,
You posted a mail to the list some months ago:
On Wed 15 Sep 2010 15:47, Cedric Cellier writes:
> I'm using guile in an C program that spawn a lot of short lived
> threads, each of which passing in guile mode (guile 1.8.7), and I'm
> facing a memory leak even when the threads does no
Hi Thomas,
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 15:10, Thomas Girod writes:
> (define (foo)
> (call/cc
>(lambda (return)
> (display "first part")
> (newline)
> (call/cc
> (lambda (cont)
> (return cont)))
> (display "second part")
> (newline
>
> guile> (define c (foo)
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> In this expression, `foo' has returned twice. The first time it
> returned a continuation, which was applied. The second time it returned
> whatever `newline' returned: the unspecified value. Applying the
> unspecified value faile
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 17:40, Keith Wright writes:
> What is (% ...)? What is a "partial continuation"?
% sets up a prompt.
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/master/guile.html/Prompts.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delimited_continuation
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/pldi93-sit
Hello list
First of all, I'm new to scheme and guile - started using them a few
days ago for a project. So here we go: this is the bit of code that
causing me troubles:
(define (foo)
(call/cc
(lambda (return)
(display "first part")
(newline)
(call/cc
(lambda (cont)
() Andy Wingo
() Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:20 +0100
R5RS and R6RS's continuations are not generally useful for making
abstractions that compose well together. I would not recommend them to
anyone.
Are you saying Guile 2.0 breaks code that uses these traditional
continuations (successfully
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 21:56, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () Andy Wingo
> () Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:20 +0100
>
>R5RS and R6RS's continuations are not generally useful for making
>abstractions that compose well together. I would not recommend them to
>anyone.
>
> Are you saying Guile 2.0
release notes:
Thanks to Mike Gran, Guile-WWW 2.30
should be usable on Guile 1.9.x.
thi
README excerpt:
This is the Guile WWW library, a set of Guile Scheme
modules to facilitate HTTP, URL and CGI programming.
NEWS excerpt:
- 2.30 | 2011-02-12
- portability fix for Guile 1.9.1
