On Sat 12 Feb 2011 21:56, Thien-Thi Nguyen <t...@gnuvola.org> writes:
> () Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> > () Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:20 +0100 > > R5RS and R6RS's continuations are not generally useful for making > abstractions that compose well together. I would not recommend them to > anyone. > > Are you saying Guile 2.0 breaks code that uses these traditional > continuations (successfully, in previous Guile versions)? No, I am not saying that. Tom's code works the same on Guile 1.8 and on 1.9/2.0. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
