ix" block.
>
It worked for me too, I had just forgot to save the file after I had edited
it. So I was running the previous version :-/
> >
> > please note that the texinfo string is wrong
> >
> > I run make check expecting to see a failed test but they all pass
> >
I added a test to the test-suite/tests/texinfo.serialize.test file,
like this
(assert-serialize '(defcodeindex (% (entry "op")))
"@defcodeindex opi
")
please note that the texinfo string is wrong
I run make check expecting to see a failed test but they
Hi,
"Jonathan S. Abrams" skribis:
> I am trying to compile Guile v1.6.4
This version dates from 2003, and has been unmaintained for years.
If this is an option for you, I highly recommend switching to
Guile 2.0.11!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hello,
I am trying to compile Guile v1.6.4 on Mac OS X v10.4.11 (PPC). When I run
the "make check" command, I receive the following error.
ERROR: srfi-19.test: SRFI date/time library: #date
(time . tz-offset)> respects local DST if no TZ-OFFSET given - arguments:
((system-error
"" writes:
> Thanks, Ian.
>
> For me compiling guile is just to satisfy a dependency of another
> software. I am really not
> familiar with guile.
>
>>(use-modules (ice-9 documentation))
>>(object-documentation extract)
> Do you mean a file in the compiling-folder/module/ice-9? I have no
>
writes:
> The first error emerges at line 1802 in install.output, which reads:
> ERROR: bit-operations.test: bit-extract: documented? - arguments: (
> (keyword-argument-error # (file #:key binary encoding guess-encoding)> "Invalid keyword" () #f))
This one is very peculiar, you would have thoug
Hi,
"" skribis:
> When I am compiling guile 2.0.9 with Intel c compiler (icc, version 13.1.0
> 20130121), some errors occur. But I could not
> figure it out. Could anybody help me?
Could you try compiling with GCC instead?
That is well tested, and best of all, it protects your freedom (see
<
On Sun 10 Jul 2011 07:14, Germán Arias writes:
> With guile 2.0.2, GCC 4.6 and gc 7.1, make check give me the error:
>
> make[5]: `test-pthread-create' is up to date.
> CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-secondary.o
> In file included from test-pthrea
hem. Has anyone been
able to report a successful build and `make check' on OS X 10.6, in
Guile 2.0.3 ?
I realize that this particular issue may not matter to you any more, but
I did want to follow up on it. Sorry for the delay. In the future,
bug-gu...@gnu.org is best for bug reports.
Thanks,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Well, with gc 7.2alpha6 works fine.
On sáb, 2011-07-09 at 23:14 -0600, Germán Arias wrote:
> With guile 2.0.2, GCC 4.6 and gc 7.1, make check give me the error:
>
> make[5]: `test-pthread-create' is up to date.
> CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-seco
With guile 2.0.2, GCC 4.6 and gc 7.1, make check give me the error:
make[5]: `test-pthread-create' is up to date.
CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-secondary.o
In file included from test-pthread-create-secondary.c:30:0:
/usr/local/include/gc/gc_version.h:17:5:
Hi,
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But it seems the code is still wrong. It seems like we'd need to go to
> things like PRIU64 which are defined to match the type, and #define
> PRISCMTINTMAX to the corresponding one along with the typedef.
I just checked and there's also `PRI{iu}MAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> "Poor Yorick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> building guile on the following machine:
>>
>> Linux *** 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Sep 25 17:24:31 EDT 2006 x86_64
>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Lin
Hi,
"Poor Yorick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> building guile on the following machine:
>
> Linux *** 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Sep 25 17:24:31 EDT 2006 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> make check fails. Apart from the following output, I'm not s
building guile on the following machine:
Linux *** 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Sep 25 17:24:31 EDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
make check fails. Apart from the following output, I'm not sure what else to
look at to find the problem. Any hints?
test-conversion.c: In fun
"Michael J. Barillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "nj" == Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> nj> We can trivially change the distro to install the (test-suite
> nj> lib) module - would that be a useful first step, and would you
> nj> be willing to look into what else i
> "nj" == Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
nj> We can trivially change the distro to install the (test-suite
nj> lib) module - would that be a useful first step, and would you
nj> be willing to look into what else is needed after that?
I can take a look at it. From what I'
"Michael J. Barillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Guile source distribution has a test-suite directory that contains a
> script and library with procedures for running tests on the Guile
> library and REPL when `make check' is invoked.
Yes, indeed.
>
From: "Michael J. Barillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:26:53 -0600
is there a suitable replacement so that a ``pragmatically efficient''
(i.e. lazy) hacker can quickly and easily create a test suite for a
Guile library that runs under automake's `check' target?
The Guile source distribution has a test-suite directory that contains a
script and library with procedures for running tests on the Guile
library and REPL when `make check' is invoked. Googling the web I found
a v1.4 Guile manual
<http://www.glug.org/docbits/guile/1.4.x/POSIX-Style-Test
20 matches
Mail list logo
