Hi,
On Mon 12 Jul 2010 22:24, Linas Vepstas writes:
> On 10 July 2010 03:22, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Fri 09 Jul 2010 22:23, Neil Jerram writes:
>>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>>
Does anyone have any input as to what module should be current when
a thread previously unknown to Guile enters G
Hi,
On 10 July 2010 03:22, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri 09 Jul 2010 22:23, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> Interestingly, the first thread has you in (guile-user), but the second
>>> has you in (guile). So you don't see the full definition of format, nor
>>> do you see
This works if I explicitely define a module _and_ export the hug symbol.
(define-module (bug))
(export hug)
(use-modules (ice-9 format))
(define (hug x) (format #t "HUG ~a !\n" x))
#include
#include
#include
static void *load_file_with_guile(void *filename)
{
scm_c_primitive_load((char *)fil
Hi,
On Fri 09 Jul 2010 22:23, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> Interestingly, the first thread has you in (guile-user), but the second
>> has you in (guile). So you don't see the full definition of format, nor
>> do you see hug.
>
> That's what I thought too. But in that case I ha
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 05 Jul 2010 09:23, ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
>
>> Suppose I have a multithreaded C program. Isn't the guile environment
>> supposed
>> to be shared amongst all threads ? That's what I understood from reading the
>> docs anyway.
>>
>> Yet this simple exemple shows
On Fri 09 Jul 2010 17:54, Cedric Cellier writes:
> -[ Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:48:33PM +0100, Andy Wingo ]
>> Interestingly, the first thread has you in (guile-user), but the second
>> has you in (guile). So you don't see the full definition of format, nor
>> do you see hug.
>
> Interresting i
-[ Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:48:33PM +0100, Andy Wingo ]
> Interestingly, the first thread has you in (guile-user), but the second
> has you in (guile). So you don't see the full definition of format, nor
> do you see hug.
Interresting indeed.
Is there a definition of these modules and their pur
On Mon 05 Jul 2010 09:23, ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> Suppose I have a multithreaded C program. Isn't the guile environment supposed
> to be shared amongst all threads ? That's what I understood from reading the
> docs anyway.
>
> Yet this simple exemple shows the opposite (see the 3 attached
By the way, I'm using guile v1.8.7(+1-3ubuntu1)
-[ Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:52:44PM +0100, Neil Jerram ]
> ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> Hm. I think I recall a bug to do with different threads starting in
> different modules. Does it work if you add
>
> (define-module (guile-user))
>
> at the start of your bug.scm ?
Same behavior :
ERRO
ri...@happyleptic.org writes:
> Suppose I have a multithreaded C program. Isn't the guile environment supposed
> to be shared amongst all threads ? That's what I understood from reading the
> docs anyway.
>
> Yet this simple exemple shows the opposite (see the 3 attached files).
> So am I supposed
Suppose I have a multithreaded C program. Isn't the guile environment supposed
to be shared amongst all threads ? That's what I understood from reading the
docs anyway.
Yet this simple exemple shows the opposite (see the 3 attached files).
So am I supposed to source my global scheme definitions in
12 matches
Mail list logo
