Hi, On 10 July 2010 03:22, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri 09 Jul 2010 22:23, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes: > >> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: >> >>> Interestingly, the first thread has you in (guile-user), but the second >>> has you in (guile). So you don't see the full definition of format, nor >>> do you see hug. >> >> That's what I thought too. But in that case I have no idea why my >> '(define-module (guile-user))' suggestion didn't work. > > I think bug.scm was loaded in the main module -- the threads just tried > to call a function defined by bug.scm, and as they were in (guile), not > (guile-user), there was the error
Yes, this sounds a lot like the bug I saw few years ago ... . >>> But it's quite ugly. Does anyone have any input as to what module should >>> be current when a thread previously unknown to Guile enters Guile? >> >> Surely it has to be (guile-user), since that what the end of boot-9.scm >> moves into - and hence is well-established for the single thread case. > > Agreed. I just pushed the following patch, which fixes Cedric's case. Thanks. Is this for guile1.8.8 or for 2.0? --linas
