Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> I assume that the main reason for using this is efficiency (rather
> than simplicity), because allegedly guile's continuations are rather
> inefficient.
Primarily, it's an efficiency hack, but you can also make a case that it
better if you can tell at a glance that t
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> Hello!
>
> Here is my implementation of for loop. I found lisp really extremely
> flexible, but there is one problem --- more often then not I do not need
> var part, so I do not care how it would be named --- all I care is that
> it will not shadow any other bindings.
>
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> I assume that the main reason for using this is efficiency (rather
> than simplicity), because allegedly guile's continuations are rather
> inefficient.
>
> On one hand, it's good to know that (and would be even better
> to be able to find it out by skimming section
2013/9/9 Taylan Ulrich B.
>
> For anyone who didn't know, "breaking" to arbitrary places is made
> simple (and efficient) with `let/ec' from the module (ice-9 control), a
> wrapper around `call-with-escape-continuation':
>
[...]
I assume that the main reason for using this is efficiency (rather
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> Actually, the whole point of hygienic (syntax-rules) macros
> is that you don't need to worry about the names of variables.
>
> I often use a very similar python-like for loop macro in my projects:
>
> http://hg.gnu.org.ua/hgweb/slayer/file/554a63bd3c6c/guile-modules
2013/9/9 Dmitry Bogatov
>
> Hello!
>
> Here is my implementation of for loop. I found lisp really extremely
> flexible, but there is one problem --- more often then not I do not need
> var part, so I do not care how it would be named --- all I care is that
> it will not shadow any other bindings.
Hello!
Here is my implementation of for loop. I found lisp really extremely
flexible, but there is one problem --- more often then not I do not need
var part, so I do not care how it would be named --- all I care is that
it will not shadow any other bindings.
I think I can do it(did not tryed it
