Hello! Here is my implementation of for loop. I found lisp really extremely flexible, but there is one problem --- more often then not I do not need var part, so I do not care how it would be named --- all I care is that it will not shadow any other bindings.
I think I can do it(did not tryed it) with `define-macro` and uninterned
symbols, but it mean give up beauty of syntax-rules.
Masters of syntax-rules and syntax-case, please give me peace of advice.
(define-syntax for
(syntax-rules (in => as)
([_ (pattern as var in list) exp ...]
[for-each (lambda (var) (match var (pattern exp ...))) list])))
PS. Please, keep in CC, I am not subscribed.
--
Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org>,
Free Software supporter and netiquette guardian.
git clone git://kaction.name/rc-files.git --depth 1
GPG: 54B7F00D
Html mail and proprietary format attachments are forwarded to /dev/null.
pgpOAGXg6Eqpa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
