On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 5:31 PM Skyler Ferris wrote:
> Is there an RSS or Atom feed for Spritely news? I don't see one on the
> web page.
>
We need to put a feed icon on the site to make this discoverable, but
here's our atom feed: https://spritely.institute/feed.xml
>
Is there an RSS or Atom feed for Spritely news? I don't see one on the
web page.
OMG. This is awesome.
On Friday, December 15, 2023 at 07:35:09 AM PST, Thompson, David
wrote:
Hey Guilers,
It's new blog post day over at Spritely! In this post, we build a
small "metacircular evaluator", SICP style, and run it in the browser
with Guile Hoot. This interpreter, while
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes:
> Hello Christine,
Hello Zelphir!
> I saw a post earlier on Mastodon and already opened it in my
> browser. Haven't got the time to really look at it yet.
>
> What is a Wireworld canvas? Is that a specific library, that interacts
> with canvas in the browser?
Ah! Wir
On 10/11/23 19:43, Christine Lemmer-Webber wrote:
Friends, Guilers, Schemers, I am thrilled, pleased, et cetera to present
you with the following: Guile Hoot can now compile real r7rs-small
programs to code that runs in latest nightly browsers:
https://spritely.institute/news/scheme-wireworld
Damien Mattei writes:
> I finished today the first version of Scheme+.
> Scheme+ is an extension of the syntax of the Scheme language.
> Scheme+ makes it easy the assignment of Scheme objects in infix (works also
> in prefix) notation with a few new operators ← (or <-), [ ],⥆ (or <+) .
>
> htt
Linus Björnstam schreef op ma 20-12-2021 om 09:15 [+0100]:
> I played around with it and it seems to rely heavily on mutation,
> which makes guile (and chez and racket for that matter) box the
> values. That adds a layer of indirection to memory access, meaning
> slower code (apart from the more ob
Hi Damien!
I played around with it and it seems to rely heavily on mutation, which makes
guile (and chez and racket for that matter) box the values. That adds a layer
of indirection to memory access, meaning slower code (apart from the more
obvious problems of continuation safety and threading
yes it is based on SRFI-105 as explained in section 7: Features.
The project is based on R6RS (R5RS too) and SRFI for compatibility.
Linus we had a discussion about bindings month ago and Scheme+ take in
account the impossibility in Scheme to have a single operator for defining
a variable anywhere
I skimmed through the website before i sent the e-mail.. was hoping you
do better job at presenting the project instead of sending a wall of text :p
From what i understood it's working with ligatures to add more
functionality to scheme?
So far i don't like that it's all one huge things.. woul
you answered only 1 minute after my post si i assume you have not read the
web page of project,but all is explained here with a ton of examples:
https://damien-mattei.github.io/Scheme-PLUS-for-Guile/Scheme+io.html
or:
https://github.com/damien-mattei/Scheme-PLUS-for-Guile/blob/main/README.md
st
From what you said i have no idea what it does.. Is that like an
alternative to geiser-guile?
On 12/20/21 01:05, Damien Mattei wrote:
Hi,
I finished today the first version of Scheme+.
Scheme+ is an extension of the syntax of the Scheme language.
Scheme+ makes it easy the assignment of Scheme o
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:32 PM Mikael Djurfeldt
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is the Guile user list.
>
> However, Guile is an implementation of scheme, just as MIT Scheme.
>
> You probably want to ask this question on the *Geiser* user list.
>
> Best regards,
> Mikael D
>
> Den tis 10 mars 202
Hi!
This is the Guile user list.
However, Guile is an implementation of scheme, just as MIT Scheme.
You probably want to ask this question on the *Geiser* user list.
Best regards,
Mikael D
Den tis 10 mars 2020 19:22Nicholas Papadonis
skrev:
> I'm using Guile to interface with MIT Scheme in E
> From: zimoun
> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:39:00 +0100
> Cc: Julien Lepiller , guile-user@gnu.org
>
> > > Is 'ctags -L' a valid option?
> > > Because I do not find the documentation about it.
> >
> > --help of Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310 say:
> >
> > -L
> >A list of
salut,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 15:35, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> > > > ctags -L - -f ~/.vim/ctags/guile
> > Is 'ctags -L' a valid option?
> > Because I do not find the documentation about it.
>
> --help of Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310 say:
>
> -L
>A list of sour
hello,
sorry i missed this reply.
> Does it make sense for your application to auto compile sources at all?
not at all :)
> I also wonder if perhaps it would be better to start a Guile REPL and
> have vim send S-expressions to the socket instead of saving a temporary
> file and starting a new G
hello,
> > > ctags -L - -f ~/.vim/ctags/guile
>
> Is 'ctags -L' a valid option?
> Because I do not find the documentation about it.
--help of Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310 say:
-L
A list of source file names are read from the specified file.
regards
marc
hello Ricardo,
> I’m still not sure I understand exactly what the result of this should
> be (as I’m not familiar with ctags), but you can get a list of loaded
> modules and the symbols they export.
i deeply regret the way i turned my message. please forget everything
you read and start with a fr
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 14:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > ctags -L - -f ~/.vim/ctags/guile
Is 'ctags -L' a valid option?
Because I do not find the documentation about it.
All the best,
simon
Hi Marc,
> i don't know what is the good way to get the list of built-in
> commands of guile so i ended up with
>
> aptitude search '~i ~n guile-2' -F%p |
> xargs -n1 dpkg -L |
> perl -lnE 'print if /[.]scm$/ && -f' |
> ctags -L - -f ~/.vim/ctags/guile
>
> any better way
Hi Marc,
> # please be quiet
>
> a way to test a code in vim is to use the interpreter as a filter using
> the ! action (:h !) or write in a pipe. if you do that with guile, the
> repl header is printed:
>
> GNU Guile 2.2.4
> Copyright (C) 1995-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 21:53, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> yet it will be distro dependant. i expected something like
> introspection, querying a state of interpreter or even parsing the
> documentation to provide a ready to use list of symbols.
My bad!
I thought it was the mailing list related to Gu
> I am sure you will come up with a more elegant trick for Guix via a
> Guile script. :-)
yet it will be distro dependant. i expected something like
introspection, querying a state of interpreter or even parsing the
documentation to provide a ready to use list of symbols.
regards,
marc
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 19:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > i don't know what is the good way to get the list of built-in
> > commands of guile so i ended up with
> >
> > aptitude search '~i ~n guile-2' -F%p |
> > xargs -n1 dpkg -L |
> > perl -lnE 'print if /[.]scm$/
Hi Marc,
> # completion
>
> i don't know what is the good way to get the list of built-in
> commands of guile so i ended up with
>
> aptitude search '~i ~n guile-2' -F%p |
> xargs -n1 dpkg -L |
> perl -lnE 'print if /[.]scm$/ && -f' |
> ctags -L - -f ~/.vim/ctags/guile
>
The first hint is: lorem ipsum.
It comes with a list of scheme resources to help you gather the right
vocabulary.
https://git.sr.ht/~schemers/competition-2019-static-blog-generator#first-hint-animata-magna-minimis
We also, have another sponsor https://serverracket.com
I will announce the next s
I am satisfied with the approach taken by R7RS of being both small and
large.
Le sam. 19 janv. 2019 à 22:39, John Cowan a écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ivan Raikov
> wrote:
>
>
>> Isn't the difference with R6RS that R7RS-large draws extensively on
>> SRFIs which are indeed attem
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ivan Raikov wrote:
> Isn't the difference with R6RS that R7RS-large draws extensively on
> SRFIs which are indeed attempts to codify existing practices?
>
SRFIs don't always codify existing practice, including the SRFIs drawn on
in past, present, and future R7RS-
On 06/21/2018 06:44 AM, Joshua Branson wrote:
Matt Wette writes:
And on this topic, I'm currently reading 'The Reasoned Schemer,' written
in the same style. The style gets the stuff into my head w/o resorting to
trying out problems on the computer (yet).
Hmmm. I've heard about the seasoned sc
Matt Wette writes:
> On 06/20/2018 07:55 AM, Thompson, David wrote
> [regarding "The Little Schemer"]:
>> It's repetitive but honestly I found that the comedic writing made the
>> exercises very entertaining. I was rarely bored. I don't play the
>> piano, but I do play drums, and the equivalent
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Jan Synáček wrote:
>
> I have a feeling that I saw a module that can parse a scheme program
> into a syntax tree somewhere. Does such module exist? Or do I have to
> roll my own?
Scheme is its own syntax tree, this is why they call Scheme (and other
Lisps) "homoico
Jan Synáček writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have a feeling that I saw a module that can parse a scheme program
> into a syntax tree somewhere. Does such module exist? Or do I have to
> roll my own?
Uh, it's called the reader. It's sort of the point of Lisp-like
languages that you write down the parse tr
Mark Polesky writes:
>> (define (my-format bool string . list-of-nums)
>> (apply format bool string (map set-precision list-of-nums)))
>>
>> (let ((a 2.0)
>> (b 1/4)
>> (c 1/3))
>> (my-format #t "~&~a ~a ~a" a b c))
>
>
> Kjetil,
>
> Awesome. Thanks. I knew there was something simp
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
(define (my-format bool string . list-of-nums)
(apply format bool string (map set-precision list-of-nums)))
(let ((a 2.0)
(b 1/4)
(c 1/3))
(my-format #t "~&~a ~a ~a" a b c))
Kjetil,
Awesome. Thanks. I knew there was something simple
> (define (my-format bool string . list-of-nums)
> (apply format bool string (map set-precision list-of-nums)))
>
> (let ((a 2.0)
> (b 1/4)
> (c 1/3))
> (my-format #t "~&~a ~a ~a" a b c))
Kjetil,
Awesome. Thanks. I knew there was something simple,
I just couldn't figure it out. T
Mark Polesky:
;; Hi.
;;
;; How can I change the following code so that
;; it returns "2 0.25 0."? That is: return
;; integers without decimal point, otherwise
;; round to as many decimal places as needed,
;; but not more than 4.
(let ((a 2.0)
(b 1/4)
(c 1/3))
(format #t "~&~a ~a
2008/6/21 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Out of pure curiosity, whats the significance of '31' in the make-module
> call in process-template?
I believe it's the initial size of the module's hash table for storing
bindings (from identifiers to variable locations). (I believe that
prime
Quoth "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, I've checked now, and it appears that the code already posted is
> the most up to date that I have.
Noted.
>> guile> (process-template "/path/to/version.html" ((foo 'bar)) (ice-9 rdelim))
>> [...]
>> :1:1: Unbound variable: begin
>> ABORT: (unbound-v
2008/6/13 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As a further option, please see attached [template.scm]. If you're
>> interested in this, please let me know, because I may have a more up
>> to date version somewhere.
>
> I'd be interested in getting ho
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a further option, please see attached [template.scm]. If you're
> interested in this, please let me know, because I may have a more up
> to date version somewhere.
I'd be interested in getting hold of the latest version of
template.scm as it does exact
Another way is to use modules (ttn-do zzz xhtml-tree)[0] and
(ttn-do zzz publishing)[1]. All of gnuvola's html, modulo
texinfo output, is rendered that way. Likewise, the servers
grumi[2] and sizzweb[3] compose using those modules.
Same idea as the others proposed, different dependencies.
thi
Hi Paul,
Sorry for bothering you off the list but I've hit some troubles with guile
mailing lists lately so I'm writing to you directly.
There's a package I've put on savannah that uses SXML (via guile) in order to
build HTML. Maybe it could be of some help to you. This is its main URL:
Julian Graham wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Paul Emsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Guilers,
I have in mind to write a little script that makes a web page about the state
of
various files.
I'd like to use some schemey way of doing this. s-expression -> HTML perhaps.
Hi Paul,
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Paul Emsley wrote:
> Dear Guilers,
>
> I have in mind to write a little script that makes a web page about the
> state of various files.
>
> I'd like to use some schemey way of doing this. s-expression -> HTML
> perhaps.
Links that could be useful:
http://en.w
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Paul,
>
> There are several good tools out there for doing this: Oleg Kiselyov
> has written a Scheme-based port of SAX called SSAX [1] that can read
> and emit S-expressions in a format he calls SXML. It's available for
> Guile as part of Andy Win
Hi Paul,
There are several good tools out there for doing this: Oleg Kiselyov
has written a Scheme-based port of SAX called SSAX [1] that can read
and emit S-expressions in a format he calls SXML. It's available for
Guile as part of Andy Wingo's guile-lib [2]. For permissive HTML
parsing, Neil V
I believe Marc Feeley is thinking along such lines. You may wish to
check out his work.
Robby
At Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:31:39 -0500, Jon Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
> I guess this is slightly OT, but I was wondering if there has been any
> activity lately as regards lisp hardware? I have heard about "lisp
Valery Syssik wrote:
I'd like (as many other developers) to embed Scheme
in multi thread application as scripting language. [...]
But all scheme implementations (Chicken,Bigloo,GUILE,PLT,S48,SCM)
implement cooperative threads and have no support of native threads
and sometimes implementations have
49 matches
Mail list logo
