hello Arne,
i already know your interesting and original web site and i read today
the zen page too.
"WM:
Use the Weakest Method that gets the job done,
but know the stronger methods to employ them as needed."
i think too it is a good philosophy to do that
Bonne journée,
Damien
On Sat, Jun 24,
Damien Mattei writes:
> really easy and powerful, but i dislike decorator, i prefer scheme's macro
> but i think too it has no sense to write big macros, in my opinion they
> should be short and avoid them when possible.
Do you know my Zen for Scheme? In that I tried to capture what I learned
a
hello Jay,
for code testing i think in this summer, when i will have updated a new
release of Scheme+ , i will show two codes to compare , one in Python
(already written) and the other in Scheme/Scheme+ (to finish...) doing the
same thing (Deep Learning - backpropagation and gradient descent) to
c
seems a great work on array Lloda , for Guile , i can not use it directly
in Scheme+ because i search portable code compatible with Racket too (and
any scheme that support SRFI 105 curly infix), but perhaps there is not a
lot of work to port it , indeed your library seems very powerful ,make me
thi
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, lloda wrote:
My library guile-newra (1) has quite general multidimensional array
slicing. The indices < can be linear ranges or arbitrary integer
arrays and they can have any rank. You can also use the indexed
array as write target. If all the indices are linear ranges th
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023, Damien Mattei wrote:
hello,
i'm porting the Python slicing (
https://docs.python.org/2/reference/expressions.html#slicings ) to Scheme
Guile and Racket.
examples in Scheme+ :
{#(1 2 3 4 5 6 7)[2 / 5]}
#(3 4 5)
i'm using / instead of : because : is already used by the
what troubled me is the uppercase in Front and the sense and i'm not easy
with english as being french. Sexp i already know as symbolic expressions ,
that are in Scheme prefix expression but could also be infix or postfix,
SRFI 105 being an infix reader for Scheme noted with curly syntax but they
e
Jun 20, 2023 02:42:34 Damien Mattei :
> what is Sexp Front?
On X front is an idiom - search for "on that front" if you want to see examples.
Sexp refers to symbolic expressions, which is the typical syntax of Lisp.
Robby
hello Jay
what is Sexp Front?
regards,
Damien
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:53 AM Jay Sulzberger wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2023, Damien Mattei wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i'm porting the Python slicing (
> > https://docs.python.org/2/reference/expressions.html#slicings ) to
> Scheme
> > Guile and R
it seems a big work ,
thanks
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 6:37 PM lloda wrote:
>
> My library guile-newra (1) has quite general multidimensional array
> slicing. The indices can be linear ranges or arbitrary integer arrays and
> they can have any rank. You can also use the indexed array as write targ
On 6/19/23 18:36, lloda wrote:
My library guile-newra (1) has quite general multidimensional array slicing.
The indices can be linear ranges or arbitrary integer arrays and they can have
any rank. You can also use the indexed array as write target. If all the
indices are linear ranges then the
My library guile-newra (1) has quite general multidimensional array slicing.
The indices can be linear ranges or arbitrary integer arrays and they can have
any rank. You can also use the indexed array as write target. If all the
indices are linear ranges then the operation is done without copi
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023, Damien Mattei wrote:
hello,
i'm porting the Python slicing (
https://docs.python.org/2/reference/expressions.html#slicings ) to Scheme
Guile and Racket.
examples in Scheme+ :
{#(1 2 3 4 5 6 7)[2 / 5]}
#(3 4 5)
Damien, thank you for your work in this!
Guile will be s
Damien Mattei writes:
> yes it needs SRFI 105 Curly infix to allow full notation.
> It defines the optional $bracket-apply$ procedure or macro (here a macro)
> as described in SRFI 105. The code is in attachment (not in my github
> because there is a lot of work again to have the same powerful a
Hello Arne,
yes it needs SRFI 105 Curly infix to allow full notation.
It defines the optional $bracket-apply$ procedure or macro (here a macro)
as described in SRFI 105. The code is in attachment (not in my github
because there is a lot of work again to have the same powerful and easy
affectation
Hi Damien,
> {#(1 2 3 4 5 6 7)[2 / 5]}
> #(3 4 5)
that looks pretty interesting. Is it compatible to curly infix / SRFI-105?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hello,
i'm porting the Python slicing (
https://docs.python.org/2/reference/expressions.html#slicings ) to Scheme
Guile and Racket.
examples in Scheme+ :
{#(1 2 3 4 5 6 7)[2 / 5]}
#(3 4 5)
i'm using / instead of : because : is already used by the SRFI 42 Eager
Comprehension
below are my testin
17 matches
Mail list logo
