Re: Patch to Guile-DBI: SCM_ASSERT

2008-11-11 Thread Linas Vepstas
2008/11/11 Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've been playing with guile and mysql recently, but mostly with my own > interface code. Well, I believe that the world is better when there are fewer, stronger libraries, as that promotes stability, maintainability, and free-of-bugs-ness. With that t

Re: Patch to Guile-DBI: SCM_ASSERT

2008-11-11 Thread Mike Gran
>From: Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Did you find this by code review, or have you been carrying this patch > for a while? I was wondering if I was the sole user in the world of this > stuff. I saw it when browsing the files after you pushed your new release. I've been playing with guile

Re: Patch to Guile-DBI: SCM_ASSERT

2008-11-11 Thread Linas Vepstas
Hi! 2008/11/10 Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A patch. SCM_ASSERT usually uses the scheme function name in the assertion > error instead of the C function name. Also, in make_g_db_handle, the > assertion for the second parameter is incorrect. Wow! Unexpected -- thanks! I've applied it; no

Patch to Guile-DBI: SCM_ASSERT

2008-11-10 Thread Mike Gran
- Original Message > From: Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was finally able to update the gna.org website for guile-dbi > with a new release. > See http://home.gna.org/guile-dbi/guile-dbi.html A patch. SCM_ASSERT usually uses the scheme function name in the assertion error