Hi! 2008/11/10 Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A patch. SCM_ASSERT usually uses the scheme function name in the assertion > error instead of the C function name. Also, in make_g_db_handle, the > assertion for the second parameter is incorrect.
Wow! Unexpected -- thanks! I've applied it; now I'll have to spin 2.1.2 someday. Did you find this by code review, or have you been carrying this patch for a while? I was wondering if I was the sole user in the world of this stuff. --linas