Hi!

2008/11/10 Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A patch.  SCM_ASSERT usually uses the scheme function name in the assertion 
> error instead of the C function name.  Also, in make_g_db_handle, the 
> assertion for the second parameter is incorrect.

Wow!  Unexpected -- thanks!  I've applied it; now I'll have to spin 2.1.2
someday.

Did you find this by code review, or have you been carrying this patch
for a while? I was wondering if I was the sole user in the world of this
stuff.

--linas


Reply via email to