Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-30 Thread Mark H Weaver
Eli Zaretskii writes: > Mark told me that someone succeeded in building MinGW Guile with > pthreads, and he built pthreads himself. Someone reported having done so, but that turned out to be false. At this point, I'm not aware of anyone who has built a working threaded Guile for MinGW. Mar

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mike Gran skribis: > The Guile build uses the in-tree Guile executable in > the GEN guile-procedure.texi step.  Backed when I hacked on Guile, > failing at that step was pretty common if the executable is less > than 100%.  But a version of Guile that isn't correct enough > to pass that step may

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-03-26 20:22 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : [...] > Last June I reported many details about the hang, you might find there > something about this stuff. See, for example, these messages: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2013-06/msg00030.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/g

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:02:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mike Gran > Cc: Ludovic Courtès , > "guile-user@gnu.org" > > The Guile build uses the in-tree Guile executable in > the GEN guile-procedure.texi step.  Backed when I hacked on Guile, > failing at that step was pretty common if the executabl

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:44:53 +0100 > From: Panicz Maciej Godek > Cc: Ludovic Courtès , > bd...@lists.opendylan.org, "guile-user@gnu.org" > > 2014-03-26 19:24 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : > >> I had a "process hacker" tool installed, and it allows me to do some > >> introspection (althou

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Mike Gran
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:45 AM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: 2014-03-26 19:24 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : > >>> I had a "process hacker" tool installed, and it allows me to do some >>> introspection (although I understand very little). [...] >> >> Isn't this the same problem I reported last

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-03-26 19:24 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : >> I had a "process hacker" tool installed, and it allows me to do some >> introspection (although I understand very little). [...] > > Isn't this the same problem I reported last year, starting here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2013

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-26 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:34:53 +0100 > From: Panicz Maciej Godek > Cc: bd...@lists.opendylan.org, "guile-user@gnu.org" > > >> I did remove the only reference to mkstemp.c that appeared in the > >> Makefile.am, then run autoreconf and configure, but it turned out that > >> there were still som

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-20 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-03-20 9:04 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Panicz Maciej Godek skribis: [...] >> I did remove the only reference to mkstemp.c that appeared in the >> Makefile.am, then run autoreconf and configure, but it turned out that >> there were still some dependencies on libguile_2.0_la-mkstemp.o in the

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Panicz Maciej Godek skribis: > 2014-03-19 14:50 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès : > >> Could you edit libguile/Makefile.am (or libguile/Makefile.in, if >> Automake isn't installed), and remove occurrences of mkstemp.c in there? >> >> Let us know if it solves the problem. > > I did remove the only refer

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-19 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2014-03-19 14:50 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Could you edit libguile/Makefile.am (or libguile/Makefile.in, if > Automake isn't installed), and remove occurrences of mkstemp.c in there? > > Let us know if it solves the problem. I did remove the only reference to mkstemp.c that appeared in the Ma

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-19 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Panicz Maciej Godek skribis: > >> Delightful to hear that. Thanks a lot for the work! >> >> However, when I'm trying to build it under mingw, I get the following error: >> >> ../lib/.libs/libgnu.a(mkstemp.o): In function `mkstemp': >> c:\dev\guile-2.0.10\l

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Panicz Maciej Godek skribis: > Delightful to hear that. Thanks a lot for the work! > > However, when I'm trying to build it under mingw, I get the following error: > > ../lib/.libs/libgnu.a(mkstemp.o): In function `mkstemp': > c:\dev\guile-2.0.10\lib/mkstemp.c:48: multiple definition of `mkstemp'

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-19 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
Delightful to hear that. Thanks a lot for the work! However, when I'm trying to build it under mingw, I get the following error: ../lib/.libs/libgnu.a(mkstemp.o): In function `mkstemp': c:\dev\guile-2.0.10\lib/mkstemp.c:48: multiple definition of `mkstemp' .libs/libguile_2.0_la-mkstemp.o:c:\dev\g

Re: GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-18 Thread Andy Wingo
Thanks to all the new contributors on this one, and thanks especially to Mark! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/

GNU Guile 2.0.10 released

2014-03-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.10, the next maintenance release for the 2.0.x stable series. This release contains 253 commits by 11 people over 11 months. The Guile web page is located at http://gnu.org/software/guile/ . Guile is an implementation of the Scheme programming lan