Greg Troxel writes:
> writes:
>
>> It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic
>> or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different
>> courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the
>> world). It's even possi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 09:17:50AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > That's probably because YANAL.
> >
> > (sorry, couldn't resist).
[...]
> Sorry, I just wanted to call attention to othe
writes:
> It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic
> or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different
> courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the
> world). It's even possible (gasp!) that the legal i
On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> That's probably because YANAL.
>
> (sorry, couldn't resist).
>
> It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic
> or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different
> courts reach different c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 07:15:04AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 08:18 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >
> > Wes Frazier writes:
> >
> > […]
> > For compiled code as well as for interpreted code which uses GPL’ed
> > cod
On 12/15/2016 08:18 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> Wes Frazier writes:
>
> […]
> For compiled code as well as for interpreted code which uses GPL’ed
> code, your own code has to be under a GPL-compatible license.
>
> If you ship the different parts together, the resulting *combined work*
>
Wes Frazier writes:
> Ive mostly stuck to compiled languages until now. However, I know that
> if I were writing compiled code, using a GPLed library with no linking
> exception, my resulting code would have to be GPLed as well. This is why
> many libraries are under the LGPL instead (including l
For guile-ncurses, only a couple of test programs are GPL. The library itself
is LGPL, if I recall correctly.
I have been poking around with guile and trying to learn scheme. However
I have a licensing question and please forgive me if this has been
answered elsewhere, ive tried searching quite a bit, and checked the GPL
Faq and couldn't find it.
I've noticed that several language bindings listed under li
