On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > That's probably because YANAL. > > (sorry, couldn't resist). > > It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic > or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different > courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the > world). It's even possible (gasp!) that the legal interpretations of things > change over time. > > If I were you, I'd just comply with what the FSF proposes, and that is pretty > clear [1]. Any reasons not to comply with that? > > Sorry if this sounds a bit grumpy. > > regards > -- tomás >
Sorry, I just wanted to call attention to other opinions. Following the FSF is the safe and sane choice. Regards, Florian
