Re: Guile release planning

2008-11-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
release that passes the tests is good. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

Re: Guile 1.7.91 has been released.

2006-02-14 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We are pleased to announce the release of Guile 1.7.91. This is a >release candidate for Guile 1.8. It can be found here: > >ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.7.91.tar.gz > >Its MD5 checksum is > >b2106c1b574e

Re: Guile 1.7.91 has been released.

2006-02-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We are pleased to announce the release of Guile 1.7.91. This is a >release candidate for Guile 1.8. It can be found here: cross-compiling from Linux/x86 to Mingw/x86: Making all in libguile make[2]: Entering directory

Re: JIT compiler

2006-01-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Indeed, I'm still slowly trying to revive Guile-VM, written by >> Keishude Nishida 5 years ago, and I'm making some progress. > >That's good to know; it looked very promising before. > >> You can >> look at it in my GNU

Re: Order of execution in quasiquote lists (again)

2006-01-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kjetil S. Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, I see it more like setting something that should be the standard >for scheme. This is the wrong group for that. You should be talking to the people that set r5rs (or r6rs) __

Re: Order of execution in quasiquote lists (again)

2006-01-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kjetil S. Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, I'm still confused and irritated that the order of execution >in quasiquote lists are not (in my opinion) proper. I wrote about >this to this list some time ago, and got the expected answer that >the scheme standar

Re: Smobs & garbage collecting

2005-12-30 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Mauduit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The funny thing is that if I stop calling (display %my-smob) then all >the smobs are correctly freed when calling scm_gc(). There was a memory leak in the display routines, which was recently fixed in the CVS branch. F