In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kjetil S. Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I'm still confused and irritated that the order of execution
>in quasiquote lists are not (in my opinion) proper. I wrote about
>this to this list some time ago, and got the expected answer that
>the scheme standard does not specify the order.
>
>However, there is nothing wrong still doing it according to the 
>specification, its still scheme.
>
>Is there a good reason why the execution is random for guile?

I think it is wise not to change this. If GUILE starts specifying a
certain execution order, people will rely on this order, which will
guarantees that their code will  break on other Schemes.






_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

Reply via email to