On March 17, 2017 11:31:50 AM GMT+01:00, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>
>What architecture and operating system is this on?
x86_64 Ubuntu GNU/Linux 4.4.0-67
--
白い熊＠相撲道
ile/guile-2.2.0/bootstrap'
Makefile:1857: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/shiroikume/compile/guile-2.2.0'
Makefile:1743: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
I haven't found anything on the web similar to this. How can I debug
what's going on - why it's failing?
--
白い熊
On 2013-08-01 16:42, 白い熊 wrote:
Clisp, or Guile and it'll run. Currently I like playing with Clisp
more, what I like about Guile is that it's a new project, so would
Meant "GNU project", not "new project". :@)
--
白い熊
it into the game a little too.
Anyhow, I've been experimenting with the latest recommendation of:
(with-output-to-string (lambda... and seems I'm close, however it coughs
up errors in Clisp, so still no go.
So if anyone would have alternate ideas, I'd be very much obliged.
Thanks for helping me.
--
白い熊
o-string (lambda () (apropos "clisp")))
is true in guile and there is no way to test equality with "" using =
So how do I determine the string is empty with lisp equivalent code? Can't use
equal? because it doesn't exist in lisp...
--
白い熊
on (= ...
comparison of output as= is the only equality function the three share so it
seems back to square one So close
--
白い熊
ned? because it's not defined in lisp or elisp.
I think I'm missing something very simple...
--
白い熊
le open function will use the appropriate lisp syntax for
opening the file.
Now I'm wondering what the most effective / fastest way is to find out not
whether a symbol is defined, but basically the answer to the self-awareness
question: am I in guile, or am I in emacs...
--
白い熊
or Emacs, or Crisp.
Thank you very much for helping me.
--
白い熊
