Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> wrote: >Here's a dilemma， unless guile/clisp/emacs have the same >checker-procedure with same name and definition, you have no promise to >check it under different language environment. The best way is >prepossess which is portable. Yes, I have been thinking very hard about this. The closest I came is apropos.
At least (apropos "guile") gives empty feedback in clisp and (apropos "clisp-data") is empty in guile and so on... So I could differentiate based on this. However there's no numeric output so I can't do a cond based on (= ... comparison of output as= is the only equality function the three share so it seems back to square one.... So close.... -- 白い熊
