Re: Dumb Licensing Questions

2016-12-24 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Greg Troxel writes: > writes: > >> It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic >> or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different >> courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the >> world). It's even possi

Re: Dumb Licensing Questions

2016-12-24 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 09:17:50AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > That's probably because YANAL. > > > > (sorry, couldn't resist). [...] > Sorry, I just wanted to call attention to othe

Re: Dumb Licensing Questions

2016-12-24 Thread Greg Troxel
writes: > It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic > or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different > courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the > world). It's even possible (gasp!) that the legal i

Re: Dumb Licensing Questions

2016-12-24 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > That's probably because YANAL. > > (sorry, couldn't resist). > > It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic > or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different > courts reach different c

Re: Dumb Licensing Questions

2016-12-24 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 07:15:04AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On 12/15/2016 08:18 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > > Wes Frazier writes: > > > > […] > > For compiled code as well as for interpreted code which uses GPL’ed > > cod