Hi,
is there any way to control the order of macro expansion?
Let's consider a particular problem.
I'm trying to write a macro to control the visibility
of certain definitions. I wrote it once, using define-macro,
but it seemed to loose some relevant information,
so I decided to rewrite it using de
Mike Gran writes:
> (quasiquote (sym unquote func))
> `(sym unquote func)
>
> Is this a valid use of unquote?
>
> I get that (cons 'a (list 'b 'c)) == (list 'a 'b 'c), but, I'm not sure
> if unquote should be valid in that sort of construction.
As has already been pointed out, since ,foo is
Hi,
[...]
> I expect the following to be equal, and they are.
>
> (cons 'sym func)
>
> (quasiquote (sym . (unquote func))) `(sym . ,func)
>
> Guile writes them both as
>
> (sym . #)
>
> But, the following is also equivalent, which is a surprise to me.
>
> (quasiquote (sym unquote func))
>
