Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The GOOPS macros (e.g. define-method) are not hygenic, and are not
> evaluated in the defining module, but rather the current one.
Ah, it sounds as a good enhancement of hygenic macros over CL-sytle
macros. As guile provides both of them, someti
William Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> guile> (use-modules ((oop goops) :renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'oop/goops:)))
>
> This seems okay. While, when i try the first example in GOOPS Info,
>
> guile> (oop/goops:define-method (+ (x ) (y ))
>(string-append x y))
> : In expression (add-meth
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 01:14 +0800, William Xu wrote:
> Hi people there,
>
> I try to learn GOOP today. As i don't want to mess with name conficts, i
> decided to add a prefix while using any modules. Thus to load GOOPS,
>
> guile> (use-modules ((oop goops) :renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'oop/goop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> what is your plan for maintaining the branches?
The release-1-6 branch remains stable of course, and the release-1-8
branch will be stable after 1.8.0 has been released, and is now in
feature freeze. "Stable" should mean "we try very hard to not
reg
Hi people there,
I try to learn GOOP today. As i don't want to mess with name conficts, i
decided to add a prefix while using any modules. Thus to load GOOPS,
guile> (use-modules ((oop goops) :renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'oop/goops:)))
This seems okay. While, when i try the first example in GO
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are pleased to announce the release of Guile 1.7.91. This is a
>release candidate for Guile 1.8. It can be found here:
>
>ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.7.91.tar.gz
>
>Its MD5 checksum is
>
>b2106c1b574e
